The Religio-Medical Masquerade: A Complete Exposure of Christian SciencePeabody, Frederick William
Religion
The Religio-Medical Masquerade: A Complete Exposure of Christian Science
Peabody, Frederick William
Christian Science -- Controversial literature
In the introduction to her “Science and Health,” published in
1898, Mrs. Eddy says that her “first pamphlet on Christian
Science was copyrighted in 1870, but it did not appear in print
until 1876, as she had learned that this science must be
demonstrated by healing before a work on the subject could be
_profitably_ published.” I emphasize the word “profitably.” At
the very start there was the resolution in the woman’s heart that
this “science,” ultimately to become a “religion,” was not to be
given to the world until it could be published with _profit_ to
her, and from the beginning, until now, _profit_ has been her
first and main consideration.
In the _Banner of Light_, the organ of the spiritualists, of July
4, 1869, and three years after the date she now claims as the
time of the “revelation,” Mrs. Eddy, then Mrs. Glover, published
the following advertisement:
“Any person desiring to learn how to heal the sick can receive
of the undersigned instruction that will enable them to
commence healing on a principle of science with success far
beyond any of the present modes. No medicine, electricity,
physiology or Hygiene required for unparalleled success in the
most difficult cases. No pay is required unless the skill is
obtained. Address Mrs. Mary B. Glover, Amesbury, Mass., Box
61.”
One is reminded of the flaunting advertisements of the cut-rate
drug stores, guaranteeing a cure by a liberal use of patent
medicines or a return of the money.
Mrs. Eddy started out with the guarantee system, no skill
imparted, no money required; but it may be believed that the
guarantee system was speedily abandoned. There was no money in a
guarantee of skill to heal disease through Mrs. Eddy’s teachings,
and a change was speedily made to the permanently-adopted system
of “_cash in advance_.”
It appears that, as to teaching, there was a progressive scale of
charges. First it was whatever she could get; then $100 in
advance, with ten per cent royalty on the students’ subsequent
income from practice, and $1,000 if, having learned the system,
he did not care to practise it; then $300 for twelve lessons,
cash “strictly in advance,” and ultimately $300 for _seven_
lessons, “cash strictly in advance.”
I have examined the court record in two litigations instituted by
Mrs. Eddy (years after God had, as she says, selected her for her
divine mission), for the recovery of money alleged by her to be
due upon a contract reading as follows:
“We, the undersigned, do hereby agree, in consideration of
instructions and manuscripts received from Mrs. Mary B. Glover,
to pay her $100 in advance, and ten per cent annually on the
income that we receive from practicing or teaching the same. We
also do hereby agree to pay the said Mary B. Glover $1,000 in
case we do not practice or teach the science she has taught
us.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account