The religions of ancient Egypt and BabyloniaSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Religion
The religions of ancient Egypt and Babylonia
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Assyro-Babylonian religion; Egypt -- Religion
Like the Egyptian Ka, consequently, the Babylonian ghost was conceived of
as a semi-material counterpart of the body, needing, like the body, drink
and food; and if recalled to the upper world in the form of an _utukku_ or
an _ekimmu_, resembling the body in every detail, even to the clothes it
wore. Moreover, as in Egypt, the doctrine of the double must be extended
to inanimate objects as well as to living things. The offerings deposited
with the dead included not only poultry and fish, but also dates and
grain, wine and water. The objects, too, which the dead had loved in his
life were laid in his grave—toys for the child, mirrors and jewellery for
the woman, the staff and the seal for the man. It must have been the
doubles of the food and drink upon which the ghost fed in the world below,
and the doubles of the other objects buried with the corpse, which it
enjoyed in its new mode of existence. There must have been ghosts of
things as well as ghosts of men.
The overlaying of primitive Sumerian animism by Semitic conceptions and
beliefs naturally introduced new elements into the views held about the
imperishable part of man, and profoundly modified the old theories
regarding it. The Zi, as we have seen, became synonymous with the vital
principle; the _lil_, the _utukku_, and the _ekimmu_ were banished to the
domain of the magician and witch. The words survived, like “ghost” in
English, but the ideas connected with them insensibly changed. In place of
En-lil, “the lord of the ghost-world,” a new conception arose, that of
Bilu or Baal, “the lord” of mankind and the visible universe, whose symbol
was the flaming sun.(228) The ghosts had to make way for living men, the
underground world of darkness for the world of light. En-lil became a
Semitic Baal, and man himself became “the son of his god.”(229)
With the rise of Semitic influence came also the influence of the culture
that emanated from Eridu. The character of Ea of Eridu lent itself more
readily to Semitic conceptions than did the character of En-lil. There was
no need for violent change; the old Sumerian god (or rather “spirit”)
retained his name and therewith many of his ancient attributes. He
remained the god of wisdom and culture, the father of Aṡari, “who does
good to man.”
When Asari was identified with Merodach the sun-god of Babylon, Semitic
influence was already in the ascendant. Merodach was already a Semitic
Baal; the supremacy of his city made him the supreme Baal of Babylonia.
The older Baal of Nippur was absorbed by the younger Baal of Babylon, and
the official cult almost ceased to remember what his attributes and
character had originally been. Even the reciter of the magical texts
probably forgot that the god had once been a chief _lil_ or ghost and
nothing more.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account