The religions of ancient Egypt and BabyloniaSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Religion
The religions of ancient Egypt and Babylonia
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Assyro-Babylonian religion; Egypt -- Religion
Istar succeeded in escaping any such effacement or degradation. Her
worship was too deeply rooted in Babylonia, and too intimately associated
with the religious traditions of the past. The same historical reasons
which prevented monotheism from developing out of Babylonian polytheism
prevented Istar from degenerating into an Ashtoreth. At times she came
perilously near to such a fate: in the penitential psalms we find the
beginnings of it; and, when Babylon became the head of the kingdom, the
supremacy of Merodach threatened the independence and authority of Istar
even more than it threatened those of the other “great gods.” But the cult
of Istar had been fixed and established long before Merodach was more than
a petty provincial god; she was the goddess and patroness of Erech, and
Erech had once been the capital of a Babylonian empire. It was needful
that that fact should be forgotten before Istar could be dethroned from
the position she held in the religion of Babylonia, whether official or
popular.
All attempts to find a Semitic etymology for the name of Istar have been a
failure. We must be content to leave it unexplained, and to recognise the
foreign character both of the name and of the goddess whom it represented.
In Babylonia the name was never Semitised; the character of the goddess,
on the other hand, was adapted, though imperfectly, to Semitic modes of
thought. She took upon her the attributes of a Baal, and presided over war
as well as over love. One result of this mingling of Semitic and Sumerian
ideas was the difficulty of fitting her into the family system of Semitic
theology. She could not have a wife, for she was a goddess; it was equally
difficult to assign to her her shadow and counterpart, which was contrary
to all the preconceptions of the Semitic mind. Generally, therefore, if
not officially, she was conceived of as a virgin, or at all events as a
goddess who might indulge in amours so long as they did not lead to
regular marriage. Even Tammuz was the bridegroom rather than the husband
of her youth, and he too had been banished to the darkness of the
underground world long before Istar herself had interfered with the
affairs of men. She has been described as the female principle
corresponding with the male principle in the world: but the description is
incorrect; she was rather the male principle in female form.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account