The religions of ancient Egypt and BabyloniaSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Religion
The religions of ancient Egypt and Babylonia
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Assyro-Babylonian religion; Egypt -- Religion
Wherever, in fact, Semitic influence prevailed, the goddess, as opposed to
the god, tended to disappear. It was but a step from the conception of a
god with a colourless counterpart, whose very existence seemed to be due
to the necessities of grammar, to that of a deity who absorbed within
himself the female as well as the male principles of the universe, and who
stood alone and unmated. A goddess who depended for her existence on a
grammatical accident could have no profound or permanent hold on the
belief of the people; she necessarily fell into the background, and the
prerogatives which had belonged to her were transferred to the god. Istar
herself, thanks to the masculine form of her name, became a god in
Southern Arabia, and was identified with Chemosh in Moab, while even in
Babylonia and Assyria she assumed the attributes of a male divinity, and
was adored as the goddess of war as well as of love.(267) In Assyria,
indeed, her warlike character predominated: she took the place of the
war-gods of Babylonia, and armed herself with the falchion and bow.
I shall have hereafter to point out how this tendency on the part of the
goddess to vanish, as it were, out of sight, leaving the god alone in
possession, resulted in Assyria in raising its supreme god Assur to
something of the position occupied by Yahveh in Israel. Assur is wifeless;
now and again, it is true, a wife is assigned to him by the pedantry of
the scribes, but who it should be was never settled; and that he needed a
wife at all, was never acknowledged generally. Like Chemosh in Moab, Assur
reigns alone; and though the immemorial influence of Babylonia kept alive
the worship of Istar by the side of him, it was Assur and Assur only who
led the Assyrian armies to victory, and in whose name they subdued the
disobedient. It was not until the kings of Assyria became kings also of
Babylon that Istar encroached on the rights of Assur, or that an Assyrian
monarch betook himself to her rather than to the god of his fathers in the
hour of his necessity. As long as the capital remained at the old city of
Assur, none but the god Assur might direct the counsels and campaigns of
its princes, or confer upon them the crown of sovereignty. When
Tiglath-pileser III. acknowledged himself the son of Bel-Merodach, and
received from his hands the right to rule, it was a sign that the older
Assyrian dynasty had passed away, that the kingdom had become a
cosmopolitan empire, and that the venerable traditions of Babylon had
subjugated its conquerors from the north. The mixed races of Babylonia had
overcome the purer Semites of Assyria, Istar had prevailed against Assur,
and Semitic monotheism sought a home in the further West.
Lecture V. Sumerian And Semitic Conceptions Of The Divine: Assur And
Monotheism.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account