The religions of ancient Egypt and BabyloniaSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Religion
The religions of ancient Egypt and Babylonia
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Assyro-Babylonian religion; Egypt -- Religion
There were many expedients for getting rid of the multitudinous spirits of
the ancient creed who had not been transmuted into Semitic deities. They
might, as we have seen, be herded together in the indistinguishable crowd
of spirits of heaven and earth that formed the angel-hosts of the gods of
light, or else be transformed into demons in the train of Tiamât, the
impersonation of chaos. Some of them might be set apart as the special
servants and messengers of the gods, and occupy the place of archangels in
the celestial hierarchy. But it was also possible to call in the aid of
cosmology, and turn them into elemental powers representing successive
stages in the history of creation. They thus continued to belong to that
inchoate period of Babylonian religion when as yet the Semitic gods had
not come into existence, and at the same time they could be identified
with those gods in the exercise of their creative power. In the language
of later metaphysic, they thus became the successive thoughts of the
creator realising themselves in the successive acts of the creation, like
the æons of Gnosticism which emanate one from the other as the realised
thoughts of God. The idea is doubtless a late one, and belongs to an age
of philosophy; but it represents an attempt to grapple with the
difficulties presented by the opposing Sumerian and Semitic elements in
Babylonian religion, and to reconcile them together. It presupposes that
identification of one god with another which the solar cult and the
Semitic conception of the goddess had made possible, and so takes us one
step further in the direction of monotheism. The divine or superhuman
beings of the Sumerian creed are not merely identified with a particular
god, but are even transformed into the male and female principles which
his government of the world or the act of creation compels him to exhibit
in concrete form.(286)
Before Babylonian theosophy could arrive thus far, two things were
necessary. The gods had to be arranged in a divine hierarchy, and the
identification of one with the other had to become possible. The
hierarchical arrangement followed from the Semitic conception of divinity.
If Baal were a counterpart of the human father, there would be a divine
family and a divine court modelled on the pattern of those of his
worshippers. The god would have not only his wife and children, but his
slaves and ministers as well. The deities of heaven would thus fall into
orderly groups of higher and lower rank; the higher gods would tend to
separate themselves more and more from those of subordinate degree, and
the latter to sink into the position of second-rate intelligences, who
stood midway between the gods and men, and depended on “the great gods”
for their offices and existence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account