The religions of ancient Egypt and BabyloniaSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Religion
The religions of ancient Egypt and Babylonia
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Assyro-Babylonian religion; Egypt -- Religion
Had the city taken its name from the god, it would be difficult to find a
satisfactory etymology for it. The spelling of the name is against our
connecting it with the word _asiru_, “he who blesses” or “consecrates,”
from which the Assyrian _asirtu_, “sanctuary,” is derived, like the name
of the Canaanitish goddess Ashêrah.(289) On the other hand, the native
Assyrian etymology is as inadmissible as the endeavours of our eighteenth
century lexicographers to find Greek or Latin derivations for Anglo-Saxon
words. The Assyrian scribes saw in Assur merely the old elemental deity
Ansar, “the firmament,” who was himself nothing more than the Sumerian
spirit of the “heavenly host.” It is wisest not to imitate them, but, as
in the case of Merodach and Istar, to leave the origin of the name Assur
unexplained.
The kings of Assyria were originally high priests of Assur. In other parts
of the Semitic world the high priest similarly preceded the king. The
father-in-law of Moses was high priest of Midian, and the high priests of
Saba in Southern Arabia developed into kings.(290) There were high priests
also in Babylonia, who took their titles not only from the gods they
served, but also from the cities over which they ruled. The peculiarity in
the case of Assyria, however, was that there the god and the city were one
and the same. When, therefore, the high priest of Assur assumed the title
of king, he still retained his priestly functions under another title. He
was priest, but no longer high priest. Assyria was a monarchy, not a
theocracy; it was founded on military force, not on priestly influence.
The king accordingly was not a representative and vicegerent of the god,
like a Babylonian prince; he represented the god Assur only because he
represented the city of Assur. It was through the city of Assur that the
god manifested himself as it were to men.
One of the consequences of this fact was that Assur was a national as
opposed to a merely local god. Wherever the power of the city extended,
there the power of the god necessarily extended as well. When Assur became
the capital of a kingdom, the whole land which owned its authority
received its name and accepted the supremacy of its god. The local cults
made way for the national cults; it was not only in Assur itself that the
god had his temple; wherever a city called itself Assyrian, the worship of
Assur held the first place. There were no old sanctuaries and cults to
displace, as in Babylonia; the deities who were adored in the cities of
Assyria were of Babylonian origin, like Ninâ and Istar; and when once
Assyria had achieved its independence, and realised that it had a national
life of its own, they were unable to maintain themselves against the
national god.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account