The religions of ancient Egypt and BabyloniaSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Religion
The religions of ancient Egypt and Babylonia
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Assyro-Babylonian religion; Egypt -- Religion
Here it will be noticed that, as in Genesis, the heavenly bodies are
regarded as already in existence. What the creator did was to establish
them in their stations, and appoint them to mark and register time. In
fact, as soon as Ansar—the upper firmament—appeared, they appeared also,
though in an embryonic form. Merodach is thus an arranger rather than a
creator, the founder of astronomy and the calendar rather than the maker
of the stars. It is significant, however, that there is no reference to
the sun; the sun-god could hardly fix for himself the laws he had to obey.
It has usually been supposed that the account of the orderly arrangement
of the stars was followed by that of the creation of animals. But the
tablet on which the latter is found is a mere fragment, and Professor
Zimmern may be right in thinking that it belongs to a different story of
the creation. At any rate, the creation in it is assigned to “the gods”
generally “in their assembly” rather than to Merodach alone. On the other
hand, as we have seen, the author of the Epic did not hesitate to
introduce into it cosmological myths and ideas which agreed but badly
together, and it is not likely that he would have omitted to notice the
creation of animate things.
But a description of the creation of the world, or even of the great
struggle between the gods of light and the dragon of darkness, was not the
main purpose of the Babylonian poem. This was the glorification of the god
of Babylon. The story of the creation was introduced into it because it
was necessary that the supreme god of the universe should also be its
creator, and it was for the same reason that the overthrow of the powers
of darkness and anarchy was assigned to Merodach alone. He usurped and
absorbed the prerogatives and attributes of the older gods; their virtues,
as it were, passed to him along with their sovereignty and kingdom. The
fact is very plainly expressed in what appears to be the concluding tablet
of the Epic. Here the names, and therewith the essential natures, of the
other deities are formally handed over to Bel-Merodach of Babylon.
Henceforward he is acknowledged in heaven as well as in earth, the supreme
Bel or Baal of Semitic faith, the father of gods and men. Ea, the lord of
the deep, and Bel of Nippur, “the lord of the earth,” alike yield up to
him their powers; he assumes their names and titles; and, thanks to the
centralising influence of Babylon, Babylonian religion approaches
monotheism as nearly as its local character ever allowed it to do. The
creator alone could rightfully claim the worship of the creatures he had
made.
But it was an approach merely; the final step was never taken, even by the
more speculative theologians of Babylonia, which swept away the polytheism
of the local cults, and left Merodach without a rival.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account