The religions of ancient Egypt and BabyloniaSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Religion
The religions of ancient Egypt and Babylonia
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Assyro-Babylonian religion; Egypt -- Religion
corresponded to the family of the worshipper on earth; the gods were
fathers and mothers, and begat children like the human parents, after whom
they were modelled. In so far, therefore, as the universe was divine, it
too must have been evolved in the same fashion; it was only when it ceased
to partake of the divine nature, and to assume its present form, that the
god could deal with the materials of which it consisted, as the potter
dealt with his clay; or could even create by the simple word of his mouth,
like the man who similarly created the names of things, and therewith the
things themselves which the names denoted. With the rise of philosophic
speculation the process of divine generation became a process of
emanation. The gods passed into mere symbols, or rather cosmic principles
and elements; they retained, indeed, their double nature as male and
female; but that was all. The human element that once was in them
disappeared, the concrete became the abstract. Mummu Tiamât was explained
as the world of immature ideas,—the simple “apprehension,” we might almost
say, of the Hegelian philosophy,—and the first of the “Æons” of the later
Gnosticism was thus started on its way. Babylonian religion had been
narrowly local and anthropomorphic; under the guidance of a cosmological
philosophy it tended to become an atheistic materialism. The poet who
wrote the introduction to the Epic of the Creation could have had but
little faith in the gods and goddesses he paraded on the scene; in the
self-evolved universe of the schools there was hardly room even for the
creator Merodach himself.
Lecture VII. The Sacred Books.
Every organised religion has had its sacred books. They have been as
indispensable to it as an organised priesthood; indeed, Mohammedanism is a
proof that the sacred book is more necessary to its existence than even a
priesthood. The sacred book binds a religion to its past; it is the
ultimate authority to which, in matters of controversy, appeal can be
made, for it enshrines those teachings of the past upon which the faith of
the present professes to rest. It remains fixed and permanent amid the
perpetual flow and ebb of human things; the generations of men pass
quickly away, rites and ceremonies change, the meaning of symbols is
forgotten, and the human memory is weak and deceitful; but the written
word endures, and the changes that pass over it are comparatively few and
slight.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account