The religions of ancient Egypt and BabyloniaSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Religion
The religions of ancient Egypt and Babylonia
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Assyro-Babylonian religion; Egypt -- Religion
There were other nomes besides the Fayyûm in which the crocodile was
worshipped. It was the sacred animal of Onuphis in the Delta, and of Ombos
in the far south of Egypt. But we must not expect to find a Sebek and a
sacred crocodile always accompanying one another. There could be cases in
which the crocodile was identified with other gods than Sebek,—with Set,
for example, as at Nubti, near Dendera. The sacred animal existed before
the god whose incarnation he afterwards became. The neolithic races were
in the valley of the Nile before the Pharaonic Egyptians, and the deities
they adored were consequently also there before the gods of the intruding
race. Ptaḥ, with his human figure, would not have been transformed into
the bull Apis if the bull had not been already in possession.
The name of the god Thoth is itself a proof of this. Thoth was the god of
Hermopolis, the modern Eshmunên, and his patronage of writing and books
shows that he must have been the deity of the Pharaonic race. The god to
whom the invention of the hieroglyphs was ascribed, could not have been
the god of an illiterate population.
Now the Egyptian form of the name Thoth is Deḥuti (or Zeḥuti), “he who
belongs to the ibis.”(77) Thoth, therefore, was not originally the ibis,
and, in spite of his bird’s head, the human body which he retained was a
traditional evidence of the fact. He was merely “attached to the
ibis,”—attached, that is to say, to the place where the ibis was the
fetish of the aborigines.
According to Manetho, it was not until the reign of the second king of the
Second Dynasty that Apis, Mnevis, and Mendes “were adjudged to be gods.”
This must mean that it was then that the State religion admitted for the
first time that the official gods of Memphis, Heliopolis, and Mendes were
incarnated in the sacred animals of the local cults. That the statement is
historically correct, may be gathered from the fact that the temples of
Memphis and Heliopolis were dedicated to Ptaḥ and Tum, and not to Apis and
Mnevis. When they were built the divinity of the bull had not yet been
officially recognised. The gods in whose honour they were founded were
gods of human form, and gods of human form they continued to be. Down to
the last days of Egyptian paganism the sun-god of Heliopolis was not a
bull, but a man; and though the mummified Apis watched over the cemeteries
of Memphis, the god of its great temple remained a mummified man and not a
mummified bull.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account