The religions of ancient Egypt and BabyloniaSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Religion
The religions of ancient Egypt and Babylonia
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Assyro-Babylonian religion; Egypt -- Religion
With the human god was closely connected the ancestor worship, which was
quite as much a characteristic of Egypt as the worship of animals. It was
due in the first instance, perhaps, to the belief that the _Ka_ of the
dead man needed food and nourishment, and that if he did not receive them
the hungry double would revenge himself on the living. To this day the
Egyptian fellahin, both Moslem and Copt, visit the tombs of their
forefathers at certain times in the year, and, after eating and drinking
beside them, place a few grains of wheat or some similar offering on a
shelf in front of a window-like opening into the tomb. But the belief in
the material needs of the _Ka_ would not of itself have sufficed to
support the long lines of priests who were attached to the cult of the
dead, or the prayers that were addressed to them. It was the deification
of the Pharaoh which caused “prophets” of Khufu and Khafra to be still
consecrated in the days of the Twenty-sixth Dynasty,(85) and prevented the
forms of the sacred animals from being pictured on the temple walls. As
long as there was a human god on earth, there could also be a human god in
heaven; and in the Pyramid texts of the Sixth Dynasty the dead Pepi or
Teta is as much a god as any deity in the pantheon.
When the Osirian faith had spread throughout Egypt, and the pious Egyptian
looked forward after death to becoming himself an “Osiris,” there was
still greater reason for the divine honours that were paid to the
ancestor. In paying them to him the worshipper was paying them to the god
of the dead. And the god of the dead was himself one of the ancestors of
the Egyptian people. He was a human god who had once ruled on earth, and
he still governed as a Pharaoh in the world beyond the grave. As the
Pharaoh was a theomorphic man, so Osiris was an anthropomorphic god. In
him the cult of the ancestor reached its fullest development.
It was natural that Pharaonic Egypt should have been, so far as we know,
the birthplace of euhemerism. Where the gods had human forms, and the men
were gods, it was inevitable that it should arise. The deification of the
Pharaoh prevented any line being drawn between the living man and the
deity he worshipped. As the man could be a god, so too could the god be a
man. The gods of Egypt were accordingly transformed into Pharaohs, who
lived and conquered and died like the Pharaohs of history. They differed
from the men of to-day only in having lived long ago, and on that account
being possessed of powers which are now lost. That they should have died
did not make them less divine and immortal. The Pharaoh also died like the
ancestors who were worshipped at the tombs, but death meant nothing more
than passing into another form of existence. It was merely a re-birth
under new conditions. The _Ka_ continued as before; there was no change in
outward shape or in the moral and intellectual powers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account