The Religious Life of LondonRitchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
Religion
The Religious Life of London
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
London (England) -- Religion; Religious thought -- England -- London
Dr. Parr, says Mr. Barker, “spoke to me of the latitudinarian divines
with approbation. He agreed with me in thinking that the most brilliant
era of the British Church since the Reformation was when it abounded with
divines of that school;” and certainly Unitarians may claim to be
represented at the present day in Broad Churchmen within the
Establishment, and in divines of a similar way of thinking without. They
have been much helped by their antagonists. No man was less of a
Unitarian than the late Archbishop Whately, yet, in a letter to Blanco
White, he candidly confessed, “Nothing in my opinion tends so much to
dispose an intelligent mind towards anti-Trinitarian views as the
Trinitarian works.”
As a sect, the Unitarians are a small body, and at one time were much
given to a display of intelligent superiority as offensive in public
bodies as in private individuals. They were narrow and exclusive, and
had little effect on the masses, who were left to go to the bad, if not
with supercilious scorn, at any rate with genteel indifference. There
was in the old-fashioned Unitarian meeting-houses something eminently
high and dry. In these days, when we have ceased to regard heaven—to
quote Tom Hood—as anybody’s rotten borough, we smile as a handful of
people sing—
“We’re a garden walled around,
Planted and made peculiar ground;”
yet no outsider a few years ago could have entered a Unitarian chapel
without feeling that such, more or less, was the abiding conviction of
all present. “Our predominant intellectual attitude,” Mr. Orr confesses
to be one reason of the little progress made by the denomination. A
Unitarian could no more conceal his sect than a Quaker. Generally he
wore spectacles; his hair was always arranged so as to do justice to his
phrenological development; on his mouth there always played a smile, half
sarcastic and half self-complacent. Nor was such an expression much to
be wondered at when you remembered that, according to his own idea, and
certainly to his own satisfaction, he had solved all religious doubts,
cleared up all religious mysteries, and annihilated, as far as regards
himself, human infirmities, ignorance, and superstition. It is easy to
comprehend how a congregation of such would be eminently respectable and
calm and self-possessed; indeed, so much so, that you felt inclined to
ask why it should have condescended to come into existence at all. Mrs.
Jarley’s waxworks, as described by that lady herself, may be taken as a
very fair description of an average Unitarian congregation at a no very
remote date. Little Nell says, “I never saw any waxworks, ma’am; is it
funnier than _Punch_?” “Funnier?” said Mrs. Jarley, in a shrill voice,
“it is not funny at all.” “Oh,” said Nell, with all possible humility.
“It is not funny at all,” repeated Mrs. Jarley; “it’s calm, and what’s
that word again—critical? No, classical—that’s it; it’s calm and
classical.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account