The Religious Life of LondonRitchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
Religion
The Religious Life of London
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
London (England) -- Religion; Religious thought -- England -- London
world’s goods in Christendom, rejoices to call itself the poor man’s
Church,—turns round, and, in his coarse, rough way, says, “Ladies and
gentlemen, I am much obliged to you. I see your little game. Pray don’t
take any trouble on my account. Please to leave me to go to the bad in
my own way. Give me the right to the free inquiry you claim for
yourselves, and don’t quarrel with me on account of its results.” Really
it seems to me the Secularist has the best of it. I may regret his
conclusions. I cannot blame his independent spirit.
Of the men who talk in this way it may be said, at any rate as regards
the metropolis, Robert Dale Owen was the teacher and apostle. Owen was
the first to proclaim to the masses that there was no such thing as moral
responsibility; that a man’s character was formed for him partly by
nature at his birth, and partly by the external influences to which he
was exposed. As man, there was for him no choice of right or wrong. Any
religion, and emphatically that of Christ, which proceeds upon the
supposition that man can lay hold of eternal life, can accept the offer
of God’s mercy, can believe and live, is false and to be rejected with
disdain. Owen was a man of blameless life—a man who made great
sacrifices of wealth, and time, and labour, on account of his ideas. As
his last apologist has well stated, “his condemnation of religion was not
the result of libertine excesses, nor of a philosophical conceit, but
followed honestly from the shallow theory he had adopted.” Amongst the
poor, ignorant, superficial denizens of our crowded cities he was hailed
as the regenerator of manhood, and made many converts. Nor are they to
be blamed. Owen met with an attentive hearing from such as Brougham and
Bentham, Earls Liverpool and Aberdeen, Jefferson and Van Buren, the Duke
of Kent and the King of Prussia; actually, we believe, he was presented
at Court. It is true in his old age he became a believer in spirits,
after all, and was buried in the little churchyard of Newton,
Montgomeryshire, in the sure and certain hope of a glorious resurrection
to eternal life; but by that time the truth or falsehood he had
proclaimed had sunk into many minds, had been re-uttered by many tongues,
had been commended to the working classes by no less a master of language
and argument than George Jacob Holyoake. Certainly, in the hands of the
latter, Owenism, under its new name of Secularism, lost none of its
power. The master was apt to be egotistic—dogmatic—much given to
repetition—very diffuse. Mr. Holyoake’s enemies cannot conscientiously
say he is that. His friends, many of them the cleverest of London men,
claim for him talents of no common order. A shop in Fleet Street was
opened—the _Reasoner_ was established—and Mr. Holyoake went all over the
land to emancipate the human mind, spell-bound by priestcraft, and to
roll back the double night of ages and of ignorance. In a little while
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account