The Religious Persecution in France 1900-1906Brodhead, J. Napier (Jane Napier)
History
The Religious Persecution in France 1900-1906
Brodhead, J. Napier (Jane Napier)
Catholic Church -- France; Church and state -- France
Recently, when it was proposed to suppress, without indemnity, the
_Majorats_ of the _ancien régime_, M. Rouvier, Président de Conseil,
indignantly rejected the motion, saying, “Il ne faut jamais que la
signature de la France soit protestée.” But when it is a question of
mere Catholics, the sense of national honour becomes blunted. They are
_hors la loi_. This form of jurisprudence has been familiar to
highwaymen from time immemorial--for them, the unarmed are always _hors
la loi_.
M. Raiberti, a deputy from Nice, eloquently protested against the vote
of urgency, declaring that the country had never been consulted. “No
law,” he said, “can be just and stable which does not express the wishes
of the people.” All in vain. The Socialist voting machine worked
automatically at every turn towards the end.
It is an incontestable fact that Separation has never appeared on any
programme these thirty-four years, except on that of 181 deputies at the
elections of 1902. Nevertheless, 341 (against 249) have just voted for
this law of Separation that is the negation of fifteen centuries of
national history.[11]
The _Gazette de France_ calculates the number of electors represented by
these 341 deputies who carried the Separation Bill in the Chambers in
July:--
“On a total of 11,219,992 French electors only 2,997,063 pronounced
yesterday by their deputies in favour of the denunciation of the
Concordat and the spoliation of the Church, voted by a so-called
majority.
“We must bear in mind that at the elections of 1902 the majority
only vanquished by 200,000 votes out of 8,000,000 voters inscribed,
and there are 400,000 functionaries. Thus spoke a senator (de
Cuverville), and he further quoted the declarations of M. Deschanel
in a public speech, July, 1905.
“A minority, he declared, governs the country, and a law voted by a
certain majority represents 25 to 30 per cent. One deputy is
elected by 22,000, another by 1000. The Department du Nord has
500,000 more inhabitants than six departments of the south-east,
yet it has five deputies less. Roubaix, with 125,000 inhabitants,
has one deputy, while the Department of Basses Alpes, with 115,000
inhabitants, has five deputies.”
It is easy to see how a little judicious electoral geometry and
arithmetic will always give the Government a majority. Each
_arrondissement_ having a deputy, it is only necessary to cut up a given
district, notably anti-clerical, into a great many _arrondissements_, in
order to secure an increased number of deputies, _blocards_; and vice
versa the process need only be reversed in districts suspected of
“clericalism.” We must also remember that at least one-third of the
electors never vote, and so the Government can always have a majority.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account