The Religious Thought of the Greeks, from Homer to the Triumph of ChristianityMoore, Clifford Herschel
Religion
The Religious Thought of the Greeks, from Homer to the Triumph of Christianity
Moore, Clifford Herschel
Greece -- Religion; Philosophy, Ancient; Religious thought -- Greece; Religious thought -- To 600
We have now reviewed the essential elements in each of the three stages
represented in the writings of the New Testament. In the first, the
teachings of Jesus show no trace of any influence exerted by Greek
philosophic or religious thought. With Paul we begin to detect the
signs of such influence—the germs of the doctrine of Logos, for
example, are found in the later epistles (Philippians, Ephesians, and
Colossians), which set forth a belief in the eternal existence of
Christ, the Son of God. But it remained for the Johannine writer to
give a fuller philosophic statement to this doctrine, and in general
to bring Christianity well within the province of Greek thought and
expression. Thenceforth Christianity belonged to the Greek intellectual
world.
FOOTNOTES:
[301] _Adv. haer._ IV, 30, 3.
[302] _Matt._ V, 44-45.
[303] _Matt._ V, 43-48; cf. _Luke_ VI, 27-36.
[304] _Matt._ V, 44-45; _Luke_ VI, 35.
[305] _Mark_ XI, 25.
[306] _Deut._ VI, 5; _Matt._ XXII, 37; _Mark_ XII, 30; _Luke_ X, 27.
[307] _Matt._ IV, 17; _Luke_ XXIV, 47.
[308] _Matt._ XVI, 13-20; _Mark_ VIII, 27-30; _Luke_ IX, 18-21. Cf.
_Mark_ XIV, 61; _Matt._ XXVI, 63.
[309] _John_ VI, 15.
[310] _Acts_ XI, 19-26.
[311] _Gal._ II, 15-16.
[312] _Gal._ III, 23-26.
[313] _Gal._ I, 16; II, 20; III, 27; IV, 19. So _Rom._ VIII, 10. Cf.
also _2 Cor._ IV, 6-7.
[314] _Col._ III, 1-3.
[315] Cf. _Rom._ VII, 4 ff.; _Phil._ III, 10 f.; and the passages
referred to p. 314.
[316] _2 Cor._ III, 17; _Rom._ VIII, 10 f.
[317] _Rom._ VIII, 15; _Gal._ III, 26 f.; IV, 6; _1 Cor._ III, 16 f.;
VI, 19.
[318] _Gal._ V, 22 f. Cf. _Rom._ XIV, 17.
[319] _1 Cor._ XII-XIV.
[320] _John_ I, 1-14.
[321] Harnack and some other scholars incline to regard the prologue as
“not the key to [the Gospel’s] comprehension”; but when we consider the
importance which John attaches to the incarnation, it is difficult to
separate the body of the book from the opening passage.
[322] Cf. _1 John_ IV, 2-3.
[323] _John_ I, 9; III, 19-21; V, 35; VIII, 12; IX, 5; XII, 35-36.
[324] _John_ XIV, 9-11.
[325] _John_ VIII, 31 ff.
[326] _1 John_ IV, 8, 16.
[327] _John_ III, 16-17; _1 John_ IV, 9-10.
[328] _John_ XIII, 34-35.
[329] Cf. _John_ XX, 31.
[330] _John_ III, 3, 6; cf. V, 24.
[331] _John_ XV, 1 ff.; IV, 7 ff.; VI, 33 ff.
[332] Theophilus, _Ad Autol._ 2, 15 (c. 180 A.D.), is the first among
our extant Greek sources to use the word Trinity (τριάς) of the nature
of God; Tertullian, _Adv. Valent._ 17 (c. 200), the first Latin writer
to employ trinitas in the same sense.
[333] The preparatory discourse put into the mouth of Jesus in _John_
XIV-XVI contains the Johannine doctrine. This discourse may be built
up from traditional sayings of Jesus, but in its present form it bears
unmistakable marks of its literary origin.
[334] _John_ XX, 31.
[335] _John_ V, 24; _1 John_ III, 14.
X
CHRISTIANITY AND PAGANISM
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account