The Revelation of St. John the Divine : $b An interpretationAmes, A. H. (Alfred Henno)
Religion
The Revelation of St. John the Divine : $b An interpretation
Ames, A. H. (Alfred Henno)
Bible. Revelation -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
It cannot be said that this same truth is so patent in the Revelation,
but it is there by justifiable inference. The fact that the saints live
and reign with Christ implies that the kingdom is a united one. The
union and fellowship of the saints with each other, without division
or alienation, is assumed. The obviousness of the truth was sufficient
reason for less explicitness of statement. At any rate, if the apostle
can be accused of any omission here he made ample amends in the
prominence given to the subject in the fourth gospel, in which he
records the prayer of our great High Priest, “That they all may be one;
as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in
us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.”
The subject which thus opens out to us is one of such absorbing
interest as to demand ample consideration. If it be true, as the words
of the prophet and, indirectly, of the apostle seem to indicate, that
one result of that spiritual quickening by the Holy Spirit called
conversion or regeneration is to bring about union between all who
call themselves disciples of Christ, then that regeneration cannot
be regarded as complete or normal which does not produce fellowship
with all other believers; neither can any Church be said to have
attained a state in any great degree approaching its ideal which is
not in union with the whole Church of Christ. And, in addition, any
instrumentalities we may employ in order to bring about the conversion
of the world must be ineffectual, or, at least, greatly shorn of their
influence, until there exists in the Christian world a unity which
finds its example and the source of its power in the divine nature.
Upon this important question there is entire consentience of opinion
among the inspired evangelists and apostles of the New Testament. They
record their conviction that Caiaphas was speaking as a true prophet
of God, however faulty his motives in so doing, when he said that Jesus
should die in order to “gather together in one the children of God
that were scattered abroad.” Appreciating the immense loss of power
which had resulted from the schism between Judah and Ephraim, a loss
felt even more severely in the moral than in the political world, they
strove with all their might to prevent a like division between the
Jewish and Gentile converts to Christ. Nor did they cease their efforts,
although laying themselves open to the imputation of inconsistency,
until finally the matter became one of life or death to Christianity.
With a tenacity which appears to us akin to obstinacy, they clung to
the hope that the Jewish nation would accept Christ as Messiah and King,
that the old Church would, under the transforming power of the Holy
Spirit, merge into the new as the dawn melts into the day, and that
thus the continuity of history would be preserved.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account