The Revolution in Tanner's LaneWhite, William Hale
General
The Revolution in Tanner's Lane
White, William Hale
England -- Fiction; Religious fiction
THE Reverend John Broad was minister of Tanner’s Lane Chapel, or, more
properly, Meeting-house, a three gabled building, with the date 1688 upon
it, which stood in a short street leading out of North Street. Why it
was called Tanner’s Lane nobody knew; for not in the memory of man had
any tanner carried on his trade there. There was nothing of any
consequence in it but the meeting-house, and when people said Tanner’s
Lane this was what they meant. There were about seven hundred and fifty
sittings in it, and on Sundays it was tolerably full, for it was attended
by large numbers of people from the surrounding villages, who came in
gigs and carts, and brought their dinners with them, which they ate in
the vestry. It was, in fact, the centre of the Dissenting activity for a
whole district. It had small affiliated meeting-houses in places like
Sheepgate, Hackston Green, and Bull’s Cross, in which service was held on
Sunday evening by the deacons of Tanner’s Lane, or by some of the young
men whom Mr. Broad prepared to be missionaries. For a great many years
the congregation had apparently undergone no change in character; but the
uniformity was only apparent. The fervid piety of Cowper’s time and of
the Evangelical revival was a thing almost of the past. The Reverend
John Broad was certainly not of the Revival type. He was a big,
gross-feeding, heavy person, with heavy ox-face and large mouth, who
might have been bad enough for anything if nature had ordained that he
should have been born in a hovel at Sheepgate or in the Black Country.
As it happened, his father was a woollen draper, and John was brought up
to the trade as a youth; got tired of it, thought he might do something
more respectable; went to a Dissenting College; took charge of a little
chapel in Buckinghamshire; married early; was removed to Tanner’s Lane,
and became a preacher of the Gospel. He was moderate in all of what he
called his “views;” neither ultra-Calvinist nor Arminian not rigid upon
Baptism, and certainly much unlike his lean and fervid predecessor, the
Reverend James Harden, M.A., who was educated at Cambridge; threw up all
his chances there when he became convinced of sin; cast in his lot with
the Independents, and wrestled even unto blood with the world, the flesh,
and the devil in Cowfold for thirty years, till he was gathered to his
rest. A fiery, ardent, untamable soul was Harden’s, bold and
uncompromising. He never scrupled to tell anybody what he thought, and
would send an arrow sharp and swift through any iniquity, no matter where
it might couch. He absolutely ruled Cowfold, hated by many, beloved by
many, feared by all—a genuine soldier of the Cross. Mr. Broad very much
preferred the indirect mode of doing good, and if he thought a brother
had done wrong, contented himself with praying in private for him. He
was, however, not a hypocrite, that is to say, not an ordinary novel or
stage hypocrite. There is no such thing as a human being simply
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account