The Revolutionary Movement of 1848-9 in Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany: With Some Examination of the Previous Thirty-three YearsMaurice, C. Edmund (Charles Edmund)
History
The Revolutionary Movement of 1848-9 in Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany: With Some Examination of the Previous Thirty-three Years
Maurice, C. Edmund (Charles Edmund)
Europe -- History -- 1848-1849; Revolutions -- Europe
It was from Neusatz, then, that, on April 8, 1848, a deputation arrived
at Presburg and declared that, while they were in sympathy with the
March movement, and had no desire to separate from Hungary, they yet
wished for protection for their national language and customs. They
therefore demanded the re-establishment of the Patriarchal dignity and
of the office of Voyvode; requesting, further, that the power of the
latter officer should be extended over the territories which the Serbs
had reconquered from the Turks. Kossuth answered that the Magyars would
do their best to respect national feeling, and to give the Serbs a
share in the freedom which the Magyars had won; but that only the
Magyar language could bind the different nationalities together.
Batthyanyi echoed the words of Kossuth in an even stronger form.
"Then," the Serbs answered, "we must look for recognition elsewhere
than at Presburg." "In that case," answered Kossuth, "the sword must
decide." "The Serbs," retorted one of the deputation, "were never
afraid of that." And so the glove was thrown down. A few days later
came a deputation from Carlowitz with the same object; for the clergy,
however little sympathy they might feel with Gaj's movement, feared,
as heartily as the citizens of Neusatz could do, the interference
of the Magyars with Serb independence. The Magyars seem to have
learned already the tyrannical arts of Metternich; for they met the
petition of the clergy with the threat that they would extend to the
Roumanians the liberties granted to the Serbs; and they were, no doubt,
proportionately disappointed when the deputation answered that they
were perfectly ready to share their rights with the Roumanians.
The quarrel thus begun soon led to an actual outbreak. In the town
of Velika-Kikinda, in the Banat, there had arisen one of those
disturbances which are the natural marks of a revolutionary period.
The peasantry, excited by the changes in their position, had begun to
expect still further advantages. A worthless adventurer had become a
candidate for one of the village judgeships, and had promised that, if
elected, he would recover for the peasantry, without compensation to
the present possessors, all the lands that their lords had taken from
them. He was elected, but was, of course, unable to carry out his
promises; and the disappointed peasantry rose in indignation and made
a riot. The soldiers were called out to suppress the movement, but
were repelled and disarmed; the magistrates' houses were broken open,
and two of them were killed. Thereupon the Magyars sent down a
Commissioner to inquire into the riot; the people were ready to
surrender the murderers to justice; but the Commissioners seized the
opportunity to declare that all the Serb villages in the neighbourhood
were concerned in a communistic rising; and, in consequence, they
placed them under martial law.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account