The Revolutionary Movement of 1848-9 in Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany: With Some Examination of the Previous Thirty-three YearsMaurice, C. Edmund (Charles Edmund)
History
The Revolutionary Movement of 1848-9 in Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany: With Some Examination of the Previous Thirty-three Years
Maurice, C. Edmund (Charles Edmund)
Europe -- History -- 1848-1849; Revolutions -- Europe
In Vienna these mutual suspicions had probably stronger justification
than they have in most cases of this kind. The courtiers, who had
plotted against Metternich, had as little desire for free government
as the Jacobins who overthrew Robespierre; and Windischgrätz was
gradually gathering round him a secret council, who were eventually to
establish a system as despotic as that of Metternich. On the other
hand, it cannot be denied that the gallant lads who had marched in
procession to the Landhaus on March 13, and who had defied the guns of
Archduke Albert, were unwisely disposed to prefer violent methods of
enforcing their opinions. Thus, when, on March 31, a law regulating
the freedom of the Press was issued, as distasteful to the Viennese as
Szemere's had been to the Hungarians, the Viennese students at once
proposed to follow the example of the students of Pesth, and burn the
law publicly. Hye persuaded them to abandon this attempt; and he,
with Fischhof, Kuranda, Schuselka and other trusted leaders, went on a
deputation to Pillersdorf, to entreat him to withdraw the law.
Pillersdorf assured them that this law was only a provisional one, and
that amendments would soon be introduced into it; but, a few days
later, Count Taaffe, another member of the Ministry, publicly
contradicted Pillersdorf's statement, and spoke of the Press law as
being a permanent one, though he promised that it should be mildly
administered. Perhaps the students may be excused if they felt no
great respect for such a Ministry. Nor were their feelings conciliated
by what they considered a growing tendency on the part of the Ministry
to make concessions of local liberties to the provinces.
After the first enthusiasm for Kossuth had a little subsided, the
Viennese began to reflect that the concession of a separate ministry
to Hungary might be a dangerous source of weakness to the central
Government; while the growing demands of the Bohemians seemed likely
to injure both the position of Vienna, and the cause of German unity.
But the Viennese were in many cases aiming at the two incompatible
objects of maintaining the position of Vienna as the capital of the
Austrian Empire, and gaining for it a new position as the second
or third town of United Germany. But a more reasonable cause of
discontent arose from the fact that, while parliaments were conceded
to Hungary and Bohemia, the Constitution which had been promised in
March to the Austrian Empire was as yet unrealized.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account