The Revolutionary Movement of 1848-9 in Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany: With Some Examination of the Previous Thirty-three YearsMaurice, C. Edmund (Charles Edmund)
History
The Revolutionary Movement of 1848-9 in Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany: With Some Examination of the Previous Thirty-three Years
Maurice, C. Edmund (Charles Edmund)
Europe -- History -- 1848-1849; Revolutions -- Europe
The bitterness roused by the passing of the Act of Union was not long
in leading to actual bloodshed. The immediate quarrel, however, arose
out of a matter connected, not with the race contest, but with the new
land laws of the country. The Hungarian Diet had decided that the
peasant should not only be freed from his dependence on the landlord,
but should be also considered by his previous payment of dues to have
earned the land on which he had worked. Naturally, disputes arose as
to the extent of the land so acquired; and in more than one case the
peasants were found to be claiming more than their own share. It was
to redress a blunder of this kind that, on June 2, a party of National
Guards, composed partly of Szeklers and partly of Magyars, entered the
Roumanian village of Mihalzi (Magyar, Mihacsfalva). The exact
circumstances of such a collision as that which followed will always
be told differently by the most honest narrators; but it seems
probable that the Roumanians, in some confused way, connected this
visit with the recent struggle about the Union; and it is certain that
the race-hatred between the Szekler and the Roumanians soon became
inflamed. The National Guard fired, and several of the Roumanians
fell. The others fled; but their previous resistance soon produced a
rumour of a general Roumanian insurrection. The Magyars were seized
with a panic; the Roumanian National Committee was dissolved, and
several of their clergy and other leaders were imprisoned. Had the
Roumanians been now organized by Austrian officers it is possible that
less might have been heard of the savagery of the new warfare. Had
some of their own leaders, who afterwards tried to control them, been
ready at this time to take the lead, many of the actual cruelties
might never have taken place. But just at this time the Emperor
answered the deputation of May 15 by referring the Roumanians to the
Magyar Ministry for the redress of their grievances, and declaring
that equality could only be carried out by enforcing the Act of Union.
This rebuff was accompanied by a letter from Schaguna written somewhat
in the same sense; and thus, finding that some of their leaders had
deserted them; that others were imprisoned; that the Emperor was
discouraging their complaints; that the Magyars were denouncing them
as rebels, and the Szekler making raids on their territory, the
Roumanians began to defend themselves by a warfare which rapidly
became exceptionally barbarous and savage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account