The Revolutionary Movement of 1848-9 in Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany: With Some Examination of the Previous Thirty-three YearsMaurice, C. Edmund (Charles Edmund)
History
The Revolutionary Movement of 1848-9 in Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany: With Some Examination of the Previous Thirty-three Years
Maurice, C. Edmund (Charles Edmund)
Europe -- History -- 1848-1849; Revolutions -- Europe
But, however ungraciously Charles Albert had done his part, he had
succeeded in quickening the enthusiasm of the Italians for a war
against Austria. Leopold of Tuscany had announced, two days before,
that the hour of the resurrection of Italy had struck, and that his
troops should march to the frontier of Tuscany; and, on April 5, he
frankly declared the purpose of this march, and ordered his troops to
help their Lombard brothers. Riots broke out both in Naples and Rome,
and the Austrian arms were torn down. Guglielmo Pepe hastened back to
Naples, after twenty seven years of exile, and demanded the immediate
departure of the troops for Lombardy. Ferdinand yielded to the popular
cry, and consented to make Pepe general of the expedition. Pius IX. was
less easy to move. He had become thoroughly scared at the progress of
events; and though he had consented to grant a Constitution, much
like that of other Princes, he could not reconcile in his mind the
contradictions between his position as Head of the Catholic Church and
as a Constitutional Italian Prince. The former position seemed to
require of him a claim to absolute authority in home affairs, and a
perfectly impartial attitude towards the various members of the
Catholic Church, whatever might be their differences of race or
government. The latter position seemed, on the contrary, to demand that
he should adapt himself to the freer life which was growing up in the
different Italian States, and that he should become the champion of
Italian unity and liberty against the Emperor of Austria. His own
inclinations and sympathies would have led him to sacrifice the new
office to the old one. He was, as already explained, much more a priest
than a prince, much more a Conservative than a Reformer. His priestly
training combined with his weak health to make new ideas distasteful to
him; and his sense of his duties as Head of the Catholic Church worked
in with that very kindliness of disposition which had betrayed him into
the position of a reformer, to make him oppose a fierce and dangerous
war. Under these circumstances, he looked with alarm on the new impulse
which Charles Albert had given to the anti-Austrian feeling throughout
Italy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account