The Revolutionary Movement of 1848-9 in Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany: With Some Examination of the Previous Thirty-three YearsMaurice, C. Edmund (Charles Edmund)
History
The Revolutionary Movement of 1848-9 in Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany: With Some Examination of the Previous Thirty-three Years
Maurice, C. Edmund (Charles Edmund)
Europe -- History -- 1848-1849; Revolutions -- Europe
This decision tended undoubtedly to bring
great confusion into Lombardy. It weakened the sympathies of those
Germans, Austrians, and Hungarians who had been well disposed towards
the Italian struggle for independence; while it gave an excuse for the
opposition of that larger body of politicians, who had hesitated
between Liberal principles and national prejudice, and who were now
eager to declare that the war had ceased to be a struggle for Italian
liberty, and was merely designed for the aggrandisement of Charles
Albert.
But, however much Charles Albert's interests might suffer from his
changeable policy, he always was helped out of his difficulties by the
contrast between his questionable acts, and the unquestionable badness
of some other prince. As the Papal Encyclical had come at the right
moment to redeem the credit which he had lost by his slackness after
the Battle of Goito, so the treachery of the King of Naples served, at
this crisis, to throw, by force of contrast, a more favourable light
on the ambitious proposals for the fusion of Lombardy with Piedmont.
Ferdinand of Naples had reluctantly consented to join in the Italian
war. The hearty dislike of Liberty, which he shared with the majority
of the Bourbon family, combined with his special jealousy of Charles
Albert to increase his desire to abandon this expedition. He feared
that a Kingdom of North Italy would be the natural result of the war,
even if the popular enthusiasm did not carry Charles Albert into
schemes of greater aggrandizement; and he had a not unreasonable
grievance against the King of Sardinia in the recent choice by the
Sicilians of the Duke of Genoa as their King. The priests in Naples,
unlike those in Lombardy and Venetia, were intriguing on behalf of
Austria, and had circulated the rumour that St. Januarius was a friend
to the Austrian Emperor. In spite of these intrigues, a Liberal
majority had been returned to the Neapolitan Parliament; and the King,
therefore, resolved to put still further limits on the power of that
Parliament, by demanding of the members an oath which would have
admitted Ferdinand's right to suppress the Sicilian movement, would
have enforced the complete acceptance of the Roman Catholic faith,
and would have prohibited any attempt to enlarge or reform the
Constitution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account