The Right Honourable Sir Henry Enfield Roscoe P.C., D.C.L., F.R.S.: A Biographical SketchThorpe, T. E. (Thomas Edward)
Science
The Right Honourable Sir Henry Enfield Roscoe P.C., D.C.L., F.R.S.: A Biographical Sketch
Thorpe, T. E. (Thomas Edward)
Roscoe, Henry E. (Henry Enfield), 1833-1915
It has been held that Dalton anticipated Avogadro in assuming that all
gases contain equal numbers of “atoms” (molecules). Dr. Debus adopts
this view, and assumes that Dalton in 1801 made use of it to explain
the phenomena of the diffusion of gases, and that this idea, along with
his early experiments on nitric oxide and oxygen, led to his atomic
theory. Roscoe and Harden, on the other hand, held that Dalton never
definitely held the view that equal volumes of gases contain an equal
number of atoms (molecules), nor had such a conception any bearing upon
his explanation of the facts of diffusion. Dissatisfied with the theory
which he did hold (viz. the repulsion exerted by an atom on all others of
its kind, but not on atoms of a different kind), he was led to consider
the behaviour of atoms of unequal size, and finding an agreement with
the observed facts, he then sought for means of determining whether
or not the atoms were actually of unequal size, and so was led to the
further developments of the theory. The weight of the evidence goes to
show that Dalton arrived at his theory in the latter half of 1803, and
that assumption on which it turned was “that no two species [of pure
elastic fluids] agree in the size of their particles.” There is no
clear indication that Dalton ever imagined that the simple gases were
diatomic in structure, which, of course, is the main point in Avogadro’s
hypothesis. It seems necessary to set out this matter in some detail
as misapprehension appears to exist, especially in Germany, as to the
merits of the controversy which arose after the appearance of Roscoe and
Harden’s work.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account