International law; Natural law; War (International law)
The next thing to be considered is, whether there may not be some act
of consent besides silence. For without some visible act, silence is
not of itself sufficient to warrant a probable conjecture of intention.
But if certain acts are done which can be accounted for upon no other
grounds than those of consent, they are supposed to ratify a treaty.
Thus if the convention of Luctatius had contained many clauses, some of
them relinquishing certain rights, and those clauses had been always
duly observed by the Romans, such observance would be justly taken for
a ratification of the treaty.
CHAPTER XVI.
THE INTERPRETATION OF TREATIES.
The external obligation of promises--Words where other conjectures
are wanting to be taken in their popular meaning--Terms of art
to be interpreted according to the acceptation of the learned in
each art, trade, and science--Conjectures requisite to explain
ambiguous or seemingly contradictory terms--Interpretation
of treaties from the subject-matter--From consequences, from
circumstances and connection--Conjectures taken from motives--The
more strict or more extensive interpretation--Treaties favourable,
odious, mixed or indifferent--The good faith of kings and nations
in treaties of equal validity with law--Rules of interpretation
formed from the above named distinctions--Whether the word
allies, in a treaty, is limited to those, who were such at the
time of making it, or applies to all who are, or hereafter may
become such--Interpretation of the prohibition of one party's
making war without the consent or injunction of the other--Of the
freedom granted to Carthage--Distinction between personal and
real treaties--A treaty made with a king continues even during
his expulsion by an usurper, such a treaty extends not to an
invader--What kind of promises ought to have the preference--The
extent of obvious conjectures--The performance of a commission
by doing something equivalent--Interpretation restricted more
closely than the bare signification of the words implies--From
an original defect of intention--From failure of the sole
motive--From a defect in the subject--Observations on the last
named conjectures--Emergencies repugnant to the original intention,
by rendering it unlawful or burdensome--Conjectures taken from
a comparison of one part of the writings with another--Rules to
be observed--In dubious cases, writings not absolutely requisite
to the validity of a contract--Contracts of Sovereigns not
to be interpreted by the Roman law--Whether the words of the
person accepting or offering the engagement ought to be most
regarded--This explained by a distinction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account