International law; Natural law; War (International law)
XXXI. We can by no means admit the rule laid down by some writers,
who maintain, that all engagements of kings, and states, ought to be
explained, as far as it is possible, upon the principles of the Roman
law: unless indeed it can be made to appear that among some states, in
their intercourse with each other, the CIVIL LAW is received as the LAW
OF NATIONS; a presumption which ought not to be hastily granted.
XXXII. As to the doubt, which Plutarch advances in his Symposiacs,
whether the words of the party offering, or those of the one accepting
a condition ought to be most attended to, it appears that where the
party accepting the terms is the promiser, the nature and substance
of the transaction will depend upon his words, if they are absolute
and unqualified. For if the offer is regarded as a positive engagement
to do certain acts, then the full extent of it will be seen by the
necessary repetition of the same words in the promise. But before a
condition is accepted, it is evident, as was seen in the chapter on
promises, that the promiser is not bound to its fulfilment; for no
right has been conferred by the one party, or acquired by the other.
Therefore the offer of a condition of this kind does not amount to a
perfect promise.
CHAPTER XVII.
ON DAMAGES OCCASIONED BY INJURY AND THE OBLIGATION TO REPAIR THEM.
On Damages occasioned by injury, and the obligation to repair
them--Every misdemeanor obliges the aggressor to repair the
loss--By loss is meant any thing repugnant to right strictly so
called--Distinction between fitness and strict right--Loss or
diminution of possession includes every injury done to the produce
as well as the property itself--Loss estimated from the time that
gain ceases--Injuries done by principals--By accessories--Injuries
done by the neglect of principal or of secondary agents--What
persons are implicated in those charges, and in what degrees--The
parties engaged answerable for all consequences--The case where
homicide or any other act of violence ensues--Case of robbery--Or
theft--Promises obtained through fraud or unjust fear--In what
cases the consequences are imputable to the suffering party--How
far the law of nations authorises states to take advantage of an
enemy's fear--How far sovereigns are answerable for any acts of
violence committed by their subjects--The case where subjects in
violation of their sovereign's permission and orders commit acts
of piracy upon allied or neutral states--No one answerable by the
law of nature for the mischief done by his cattle, his slaves,
or his ship--Damages allowed for injuries done to reputation or
honour--What kind of reparation allowed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account