The rise, progress, and phases of human slavery: How it came into the world and how it shall be made to go outO'Brien, James Bronterre
History
The rise, progress, and phases of human slavery: How it came into the world and how it shall be made to go out
O'Brien, James Bronterre
Labor; Labor movement; Slavery; Social problems; Working class
In truth, universal suffrage is no guarantee at all for liberty,
unless it be accompanied, on the part of the working classes, with a
knowledge of their social rights, and a consequent determination to use
political power for their establishment. The Romans, the Spartans and
Athenians, the Sicilians, and many other ancient peoples had universal
suffrage--at least, a vote for every citizen who was not a helot or a
bondsman; but it proved of no use to them, for want of knowing their
social rights. For the like reason, the Irish made no good use of
their forty-shilling freehold vote, when they had it; and, for the
same reason, they offered no resistance when it was taken away. The
French people had universal suffrage in 1793. Their Convention of that
period was elected by universal suffrage; and the constitution it made
was far more democratic than the French constitution of 1848. But, not
understanding their social rights then so well as they do now, they
suffered their landlords and money-lords to rob them of it, just as
the old Romans, Athenians, &c., had allowed _their_ land and money
lords to do in their day. After the Convention had succeeded, with
the aid of the Parisian shopocracy, in murdering Robespierre and in
striking terror into all who, like him, loved justice and the people,
they not only abolished the democratic constitution of 1793 and put a
middle-class constitution in its place, but they actually decreed that
they (the Convention members) should constitute _two-thirds_ of the
next Legislative Assembly, and that the nation should be at liberty
to choose only the remaining third! Strange to say, too, the people
submitted to this, as to every other abomination of the times; they
submitted because the great mass of them were too profoundly ignorant
of their social rights to take much interest in the franchise question.
It ever was so, it ever will be so, with a people ignorant of their
social rights: they will never risk life or limb in defence of their
_political_ till they comprehend their _social_ rights.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account