The rise, progress, and phases of human slavery: How it came into the world and how it shall be made to go outO'Brien, James Bronterre
History
The rise, progress, and phases of human slavery: How it came into the world and how it shall be made to go out
O'Brien, James Bronterre
Labor; Labor movement; Slavery; Social problems; Working class
rights of property exist in a country where such a monetary system
coexists with private ownership of the soil, is a monstrous perversion
of language. It is not the rights of property, but the wrongs of
robbery, that these land and money laws tend to conservate.
The prime necessity of man is to live: he cannot live without corn,
unless in the lowest condition of the savage; but he may not only live,
but live in comfort, without gold or silver. They are not the “staffs
of life,” however in our ignorance we may bow the knee to them as to
graven images. We invest them with supreme power, as superstition
invests its idols. The ancient fabulist who sketched the character of
_Midas_ seems to have written, by anticipation, a satire on modern
credulity. _Midas_ enjoyed the fatal gift of turning all he touched
into gold; his food was transmuted into the precious metal, and
starvation taught him that corn was the true standard of all that was
physically valuable. _Midas_ was the prototype of modern bullionists
and moneymongers. The Bank of England can now pave its floors with
gold; but what does it avail to the people? And yet was it not the
industry of the people that raised the ore from the mines, and brought
it hither by the sale or exchange of their labour, sustained by corn,
the produce of labour in another form? What was the _intrinsic_ value
of gold to _Midas_?
We must not confound the _qualities_ of a mineral with its
_properties_. Undoubtedly, the precious metals possess durability,
sameness, great value in small bulk, portability, resistance to wear
and tear, in a greater degree than any other substances; but these
qualities _per se_ do not constitute them _money_,--they do no more
than recommend them to mercantile nations as the best instruments of
their kind out of which money can be manufactured; it is the act of
the legislature, and that alone, which gives them the character and
force of a _legal tender_, without which they would not form part of
the currency of a nation. The legislature could confer the same power
on any other material, even the most worthless, as Lycurgus did on
iron, deprived of its malleability; and yet Sparta flourished with that
circulating medium; nay, more, Sparta fell into ruin when the precious
metals superseded the worthless iron, which its rulers were compelled
to revive before the Republic was restored to prosperity. Some Eastern
nations have used _cowries_ (small shells) as money; and the Russians,
in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, employed the skins of
squirrels and martens. We ourselves use paper, and have used it without
the condition of convertibility. In fact, if gold and silver had never
been deposited in the bowels of the earth, or had been suffered to
remain there, the wealth of nations would not have been deteriorated
one farthing. They are the _signs_ of the thing signified, made such
by Act of Parliament; they will neither feed us, nor clothe us, nor
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account