The rise, progress, and phases of human slavery: How it came into the world and how it shall be made to go outO'Brien, James Bronterre
History
The rise, progress, and phases of human slavery: How it came into the world and how it shall be made to go out
O'Brien, James Bronterre
Labor; Labor movement; Slavery; Social problems; Working class
Besides the private persecution which never ceased (and which is always
more galling and unbearable than the public), there were at least ten
great imperial crusades directed against Christianity. When we say
directed against Christianity, we wish to be distinctly understood as
meaning against _liberty_ and _equality_. About the _spiritualism_ of
Christianity the pagan rulers cared not a straw, more than they did
about their own gods. Religion was a mere pretence in the matter, as
it is in all such matters. It served their purposes with the multitude
(who alone are sincere on such occasions); and that is all they
cared for. It is by viewing persecution in this light--the only true
light--that modern reformers can profit by our remarks on this head.
The first great persecution (which took place under Nero, about A.D.
64) is noticed by Tacitus in his “Annals.” From the language used by
that historian, it is manifest that the wealthier classes of Rome
regarded the Christians of that period as a most dangerous combination
against not only the government, but (to use a _doctrinaire_ phrase)
against “society” itself. Tacitus--himself an aristocrat--regarded
the aristocratic orders of his day as constituting _society_; and
finding these orders to be no favourites with the Christians, he
roundly accuses the latter of “hatred towards the human race,” and
describes them as followers of _one_ Christ, who was the founder of
a “deplorable and destructive superstition”! In the same way, the
Bonapartes, the Thiers, and the Guizots of the present day represent
their own plundering class as _society_, and describe such men as Ledru
Rollin, Mazzini, Louis Blanc, Proudhon, &c., as enemies of all law
and order--as enemies of family, property, and religion,--in short,
as warring against “the very existence of society itself” (their own
words), because they preferred the rights and happiness of the great
majority to the usurpations of a criminal and contemptible minority.
It is now an established fact--a fact as well attested as any in
history--that the insurrection and bloody carnage in June, 1848, was
preconcerted and with great pains elaborated by the friends of “law and
order,” in order to purge “society” of Red Republicanism and Socialism,
or (to use their own phrase) _pour en finir_--_i.e._ to make a finish
of the democratic and social republic by drowning it in the blood of
its authors and most heroic defenders.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account