Suppose, for the sake of hypothesis, a simple case. Suppose a great
arterial road to be built joining the heart of London and the heart
of Birmingham in a straight line: it would pass just by Tring and
Buckingham and then on through the gap between Leamington and Warwick.
A man living at Windsor and desiring to reach Coventry, and using the
new method of fast travel, would seek this main road at its nearest
point and leave it again at the nearest point to his terminus. It would
be a less picturesque, but a much safer and quicker way of doing his
business. It would add a dozen miles to his total trajectory, but it
would save a much more than corresponding amount of strain and expense
of energy in following the series of narrow and winding roads most
nearly connecting the two points. The same would be true of any other
trajectory not directly served by the new roads. The advantage of safe
and rapid travel on a first-class surface of very broad gauge, free of
horses and pedestrians, would make people take a “Z” to include as much
as possible of such a road rather than cling to the shorter line.
The final effect would be the relief of congestion upon the typically
narrow winding roads which cover the surface of England. They would
be relieved, in the case we have quoted, not only of the great mass
of urban traffic between London and Birmingham; they would be also
relieved of the very considerable local traffic--not entirely relieved,
of course, but relieved in a proportion large enough to make a very
sensible difference to modern communications.
Though the thing still remains pure theory and though the political and
social obstacles to it are very serious indeed (any trajectory you name
in this crowded island would destroy much which all our people--let
alone the owners--love to preserve), yet it is worth while to analyse
the conditions of such roads, because only thus can we establish the
main rules which, under whatever modification, must ultimately govern
the change that should come.
iii
We need five things:
(1) A very strong foundation, upon which depends--
(2) A permanently good surface;
(3) The avoidance of sudden curves (in which is included the avoidance
of obstacles hiding the approaches to any curve);
(4) Great width;
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account