The Rogerenes: some hitherto unpublished annals belonging to the colonial history of ConnecticutBolles, John R. (John Rogers)
History
The Rogerenes: some hitherto unpublished annals belonging to the colonial history of Connecticut
Bolles, John R. (John Rogers)
Rogerenes -- History
At the period of the antislavery agitation, some of the descendants
of John Rogers and John Bolles on the New London side (no longer
called by the name of Rogerenes), and other sympathizers with those
of Quakertown, attended meetings in the upper chamber of the house
of many gables, and joined with them in antislavery and other
Rogerene sentiments, declarations and endeavors. Among these
visitors was William Bolles,[178] the enterprising book publisher of
New London (Part I., Chapter VII.), who had become an attendant upon
the services of the Baptist church of New London; but who withdrew
from such attendance after discovery that the minister and leading
members of that church expected those opposed to slavery to maintain
silence upon that subject. He published a paper in this cause, in
1838, called _The Ultimatum_, with the following heading:—
ULTIMATUM.
THE PRESS MUZZLED: PULPIT GAGGED: LIBERTY OF SPEECH DESTROYED; THE
CONSTITUTION TRAMPLED UNDER FOOT; MOBS TRIUMPHANT, AND CITIZENS
BUTCHERED: OR, SLAVERY ABOLISHED—THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE.—FELLOW
CITIZENS, MAKE YOUR ELECTION.
Footnote 178:
Great-grandson of John Rogers, 2d, and of John Bolles.
A few disconnected sentences (by way of brevity) selected from one
of the editorial columns of this sheet, will give some idea of its
style:—
It is with pleasure we make our second appearance before our
fellow citizens, especially when we remember the avidity with
which our first number was read, so that we were obliged to print
a second edition. Our sheet is the organ of no association of men
or body of men, but it is the friend of the oppressed and the
uncompromising enemy of all abuses in Church and State. Our
friends S. and J. must not be surprised that their communications
are not admitted—the language is too harsh, and partakes a little
too much of the denunciatory spirit for us. We care not how
severely sin is rebuked, but we would remind them that a rebuke is
severe in proportion as the spirit is kind and the language
courteous—our object is to conciliate and reform, not to
exasperate.
About the year 1850, several noted abolitionists came to New London
to hold a meeting. Rogerenes from Quakertown gathered with others to
hear the speeches. When the time for the meeting arrived, the use of
the court-house, which had previously been promised them, was
refused. In this dilemma, Mr. Bolles told the speakers they could go
to the burying-ground and there speak, standing upon his mother’s
grave. The meeting took place, but during its continuance the
speakers were pelted with rotten eggs.[179]
Footnote 179:
This information was furnished by a native of Quakertown who
attended this meeting—Mr. Ira Whipple, afterwards of Westerly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account