Who, for
instance, has not found that he can learn more French history from French
memoirs, than even from all the truly learned and admirable histories of
France which have been written of late years? There are those, too, who
will say of good old Plutarch's lives (now-a-days, I think, too much
neglected), what some great man used to say of Shakspeare and English
history--that all the ancient history which they really knew, they had
got from Plutarch. I am free to confess that I have learnt what little I
know of the middle-ages, what they were like, how they came to be what
they were, and how they issued in the Reformation, not so much from the
study of the books about them (many and wise though they are), as from
the thumbing over, for years, the semi-mythical saints' lives of Surius
and the Bollandists.
Without doubt History obeys, and always has obeyed, in the long run,
certain laws. But those laws assert themselves, and are to be
discovered, not in things, but in persons; in the actions of human
beings; and just in proportion as we understand human beings, shall we
understand the laws which they have obeyed, or which have avenged
themselves on their disobedience. This may seem a truism: if it be such,
it is one which we cannot too often repeat to ourselves just now, when
the rapid progress of science is tempting us to look at human beings
rather as things than as persons, and at abstractions (under the name of
laws) rather as persons than as things. Discovering, to our just
delight, order and law all around us, in a thousand events which seemed
to our fathers fortuitous and arbitrary, we are dazzled just now by the
magnificent prospect opening before us, and fall, too often, into more
than one serious mistake.
First; students try to explain too often all the facts which they meet by
the very few laws which they know; and especially moral phaenomena by
physical, or at least economic laws. There is an excuse for this last
error. Much which was thought, a few centuries since, to belong to the
spiritual world, is now found to belong to the material; and the
physician is consulted, where the exorcist used to be called in. But it
is a somewhat hasty corollary therefrom, and one not likely to find
favour in this University, that moral laws and spiritual agencies have
nothing at all to do with the history of the human race. We shall not be
inclined here, I trust, to explain (as some one tried to do lately) the
Crusades by a hypothesis of over-stocked labour-markets on the Continent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account