But most painful, and most dangerous to the veteran sovereign, is it to
have learnt to suspect, perhaps to despise, those whom he rules; to have
thrown away all his labour upon knaves and fools; to have cast his pearls
before swine, and find them turning again and rending him. That feeling,
forced from Queen Elizabeth, in her old age, that tragic cry, 'I am a
miserable forlorn woman. There is none about me whom I can trust.' She
was a woman, always longing for some one to love; and her heart broke
under it all. But do you not see that where the ruler is not an
affectionate woman, but a strong proud man, the effect may be very
different, and very terrible?--how, roused to indignation, scorn,
suspicion, rage, he may turn to bay against his own subjects, with
'Scoundrels! you have seen the fair side of my character, and in vain.
Now you shall see the foul, and beware for yourselves.'
Even so, I fancy, did old Dietrich turn to bay, and did deeds which have
blackened his name for ever. Heaven forgive him! for surely he had
provocation enough and to spare.
I have told you of the simple, half-superstitious respect which the
Teuton had for the prestige of Rome. Dietrich seems to have partaken of
it, like the rest. Else why did he not set himself up as Caesar of Rome?
Why did he always consider himself as son-in-arms, and quasi-vassal, of
the Caesar of Constantinople? He had been in youth overawed by the
cunning civilization which he had seen in the great city. He felt, with
a noble modesty, that he could not emulate it. He must copy it afar off.
He must take to his counsels men like Cassiodorus, Symmachus, Boethius,
born and bred in it; trained from childhood in the craft by which, as a
patent fact, the Kaisers of Rome had been for centuries, even in their
decay and degradation, the rulers of the nations. Yet beneath that there
must have been a perpetual under-current of contempt for it and for
Rome--the 'colluvies gentium'--the sink of the nations, with its conceit,
its pomposity, its beggary, its profligacy, its superstition, its
pretence of preserving the Roman law and rights, while practically it
cared for no law nor right at all. Dietrich had had to write letter upon
letter, to prevent the green and blue factions cutting each other's
throats at the public spectacles; letters to the tribunus voluptatum, who
had to look after the pantomimes and loose women, telling him to keep the
poor wretches in some decent order, and to set them and the city an
example of a better life, by being a chaste and respectable man himself.
Letter upon letter of Cassiodorus', written in Dietrich's name, disclose
a state of things in Rome on which a Goth could look only with disgust
and contempt.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account