The Roman assemblies from their origin to the end of the RepublicBotsford, George Willis
History
The Roman assemblies from their origin to the end of the Republic
Botsford, George Willis
Constitutional law -- Rome; Rome -- Politics and government
The capital actions brought by the tribunes before the centuries in the
period from Hortensius to the end of the republic have already been
reviewed.[1929] We have now to consider the finable cases brought before
the comitia tributa in the same period. It is characteristic of the era
immediately following the Hortensian legislation, 287-232, described
in the following chapter as politically stagnant,[1930] that only one
tribunician prosecution is mentioned, and that against the consuls
of 249 for contempt of the auspices. Appius Claudius Pulcher, one of
the consuls, was fined a hundred and twenty thousand asses, after the
action had been transferred from the centuries to the tribes in the way
described in an earlier chapter.[1931]
In accord with the spirit of the Flaminian era, 232-201, on the other
hand, is the prosecution of the retired consuls, M. Livius Salinator
and L. Aemilius Paulus, on the ground that they had unjustly distributed
the booty gained in war. Technically the charge seems to have been
peculatus;[1932] it was brought before the tribes in 218, doubtless by
tribunes of the plebs. Aemilius narrowly escaped condemnation; Livius
was fined. The popular feeling against them was extremely bitter.[1933]
In 214 M. Atilius Regulus and P. Furius Philus, censors, degraded to
the condition of aerarius[1934] L. Caecilius Metellus,[1935] who after
the battle of Cannae had tried to persuade the knights to abandon
Italy.[1936] He was elected tribune of the plebs for the following year,
and made use of his office in an attempt to prosecute the censors before
the close of their administration. His purpose was thwarted, however,
by the intercession of the remaining nine tribunes,[1937] who in this
way saved for a time a conservative principle of the constitution—the
inviolability of the magistrate from prosecutions while in office.[1938]
The trial of Postumius the publican, beginning in a finable action and
ending as perduellio, has been treated elsewhere.[1939] In the same
period falls the trial of the tresviri nocturni for appearing too late at
a fire. They were accused by the tribunes and condemned by a vote of the
tribes.[1940]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account