Tum mihi post sacras monstratur Iunius idus
Utilis et nuptis, utilis esse viris,
Primaque pars huius thalamis aliena reperta est,
Nam mihi sic coniunx sancta Dialis ait;
‘Donec ab Iliaca placidus purgamina Vesta
Detulerit flavis in mare Thybris aquis,
Non mihi detonsos crines depectere buxo,
Non ungues ferro subsecuisse licet,
Non tetigisse virum, quamvis Iovis ille sacerdos,
Quamvis perpetua sit mihi lege datus.
Tu quoque ne propera. Melius tua filia nubet
Ignea cum pura Vesta nitebit humo.’
What is the meaning of this singular aspect of the Vesta-cult? Why
should these days be so ill-omened or so sacred that during them
marriages might not be celebrated, and the priestess of Jupiter might
not hold any intercourse with her husband, cut her hair, or pare her
nails? And what is the explanation of the annotation Q[uando] St[ercus]
D[elatum] F[as][598], which on the 15th indicated the breaking of the
spell, and a return to ordinary ways of life? Before attempting to
answer these questions, it will be as well to say a few words about the
nature and probable origin of the worship of Vesta. Owing to the
remarkable vitality and purity of this cult throughout the whole of
Roman history, we do not meet here with those baffling obscurities which
so often beset us in dealing with deities that had lost all life and
shape when Roman scholars began to investigate them. And yet we know
that we are here in the presence of rites and ideas of immemorial
antiquity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account