The god had a bronze statue in the Vicus Tuscus, and perhaps for that
reason was believed to have come to Rome from Etruria[854]. But his
name, like Picumnus, is beyond doubt Latin, and may be supposed to
indicate the turn or change in the year at the fruit-season[855]; and if
he really was an immigrant, which is possible, his original cult in
Etruria was not Etruscan proper, but old Italian.
Three other dedications are mentioned in the calendars as occurring on
Aug. 13: to Hercules invictus ad portam trigeminam; to Castor and Pollax
in circo Flaminio; and to Flora ad circum maximum. Of these cults
nothing of special interest is known, and the deities are treated of in
other parts of this work.
XVI KAL. SEPT. (AUG. 17). NP.
PORT[UNALIA]. (MAFF. AMIT. VALL.)
TIBERINALIA. (PHILOC.)
FERIAE PORTUNO. (AMIT. ANT.)
PORTUNO AD PONTEM AEMILIUM. (AMIT. VALL. ALLIF.)
IANO AD THEATRUM MARCELLI. (VALL. ALLIF.)
Who was Portunus, and why was his festival in August? Why was it at the
Pons Aemilius, and where was that bridge? Can any connexion be found
between this and the other August rites? These questions cannot be
answered satisfactorily; the scraps of evidence are too few and too
doubtful. We have here to do with another ancient deity, who survives in
the calendars only, and in the solitary record that he had a special
flamen. This flamen might be a plebeian[856], which seems to suit with
the character of other cults in the district by the Tiber, and may
perhaps point to a somewhat later origin than that of the most ancient
city worships.
There are but two or three texts which help us to make an uncertain
guess at the nature of Portunus. Varro[857] wrote ‘Portunalia et
Portuno, quoi eo die aedes in portu Tiberino facta et feriae
institutae.’ Mommsen takes the _portus_ here as meaning Ostia at the
mouth of the Tiber, and imagines a yearly procession thither from Rome
on this day[858]. This of course is pure hypothesis; but if, as he
insists, _portus_ is rarely or never used for a city wharf on a river
such as that at Rome, we may perhaps accept it provisionally; but in
doing so we have to yield another point to Mommsen, viz. the identity of
Portunus and Tiberinus. In the very late calendar of Philocalus this day
is called Tiberinalia, and from this Mommsen infers the identity of the
two deities[859].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account