The personification of a moral idea would hardly seem likely to be as
old as Numa; yet there are points in the ritual which suggest a high
antiquity, apart from tradition. It was the three chief flamines who
thus drove to the Capitol—i. e. those of Jupiter, Mars, and Quirinus;
these at least were the three who had been just instituted by Numa (Liv.
1. 20), and to them Livy must be referring. As has been often pointed
out, the presence of flamines at a rite is always evidence of its
antiquity; and in this case they may have represented the union of the
two communities of Septimontium and Quirinal in a common worship on the
Capitol, this central point being represented by the Flamen Dialis. The
curious fact that the right hands of these flamens were wrapped up to
the fingers in white cloth is another obvious sign of antiquity, and is
explained as meaning that the right hand, which was given to another in
pledging one’s word, then as now[1031], was pure and clean, as was the
mind of the pledger[1032]. A sacred object, statue or victim, was often
thus wrapped or tied with fillets (_vittae_); and the μύσται in the
Eleusinian mysteries seem to have worn a crocus-coloured band on the
right hand and right foot[1033]. The statue of the goddess in her temple
had probably the right hand so covered, if at least we are at liberty so
to interpret the words of Horace, ‘albo Fides velata panno’[1034].
A word about the _tigillum sororium_[1035]. What this was, and where it
was, can be made out with some certainty; beyond that all is obscure. It
was a beam, renewed from time to time, let into the opposite walls of a
street which led down from the Carinae to the Vicus Cyprius, now the via
del Colosseo[1036]. It remained till at least the fourth century A.D. It
is now generally explained as a primitive Janus-arch, apparently on the
ground that one of the altars below it was to Janus Curiatius[1037]. As
it seems, however, to have been a single beam, without supports except
the street walls[1038], I am unable to understand this conclusion; and
as the Roman antiquaries never supposed it to be such, we can hardly do
so safely. They believed it to be a memorial of the expiation undergone
by the legendary Horatius for the murder of his sister. Acquitted by the
people on appeal, he had to make religious expiation, and this he did by
the erection of an altar to Janus Curiatius, and another to Juno
Sororia[1039], and by passing under a yoke, which was afterwards
represented by the _tigillum_.
We may leave the _tigillum_ as really inexplicable, unless we are to
accept the suggestion of Roscher[1040], that the germ of the legend is
to be found in the practice of creeping through a split tree to get rid
of spell or disease. The two altars demand a word.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account