and comments thus[1133]: ‘Fauni dii Latinorum, ita ut Faunus et Fauna
sit.’ The evidence of Virgil, always valuable for rural antiquities, is
equally clear:
Et vos agrestum praesentia numina, Fauni,
Ferte simul Faunique pedem Dryadesque puellae[1134].
Servius has an interesting note on these lines: why, he asks, does the
poet put Faunus in the plural, when there is but one? We might be
tempted to think Virgil wrong and his commentator right, the poet
representing Greek ideas and the scholar Italian, but for a still more
curious note of Probus on the same passage: ‘Plures (Fauni) existimantur
esse etiam praesentes: idcirco rusticis persuasum est incolentibus eam
partem Italiae quae suburbana est, saepe eos in agris conspici.’ My
belief is that these words give us the genuine idea of Faunus in the
rustic mind, surviving in central Italy long after he had been
appropriated as a conventional Roman deity. We seem in the case of
Faunus to be able to catch a deity in the process of manufacture—of
elevation from a lower, multiplex, daemonistic form, to a higher and
more uniform and more rigid one. Yet so excellent a scholar as Wissowa
holds exactly the opposite view, that there was but one Faunus, and that
his multiplication is simply the result of Roman acquaintance with Pan
and the Satyrs[1135]. It would have been more satisfactory if he had
given us an explanation from his point of view of the passage of Probus
just quoted, or had shown us how these Greek notions could have
penetrated into the rural parts of Italy.
(2) Another point which comes out distinctly—unless our Roman
authorities were wholly misled—is the _woodland_ character of the Fauni.
A passage of Varro, of which I quoted the first words just now, goes on
thus: ‘hos versibus quos vocant Saturnios _in silvestribus locis_
traditum est solitos fari futura, a quo fando Faunos dictos.’ This seems
to be a genuine Italian tradition. Virgil was not talking Greek when he
wrote[1136]
Haec nemora indigenae Fauni Nymphaeque tenebant
Gensque virum truncis et duro robore nata,
Queis neque mos neque cultus erat, &c.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account