We owe this explanation of Janus chiefly to Roscher’s article, and
Roscher himself owed it to the fact that his study of Janus for the
article was a second and not a first attempt. In _Hermes der Windgott_
(Leipzig, 1878) he had arrived at a very different and a far less
rational conclusion. The influence of Mannhardt and the folk-lorists
set him on the right track.
Footnote 1256:
Nigidius Figulus in Macrob. i. 9. 8.
Footnote 1257:
See Roscher, _Lex._ 44.
Footnote 1258:
Macrob. 1. 9. 9; Lydus, _de Mensibus_, 4. 6 (who quotes Lutatius).
Footnote 1259:
Schwegler, _R. G._ i. 218 foll.; Preller, 1. 168 foll. The etymology
is weak; the god and goddess have nothing common in cult or myth; it
is not certain that Diana was originally the moon; and the great
Italian deities are not coupled together in this way.
Footnote 1260:
ii. 125 foll. Cf. Müller’s _Etrusker_ (ed. Deecke), ii. 58 foll.
Müller, with his usual good sense, concluded from the evidence that
the Latin Janus was a god of gates; but he thought that an Etruscan
deity of the vault or arch of heaven had been amalgamated with him.
This is not impossible, if there was really such an Etruscan god; and
Deecke finds him in Ani, who in Etruscan theology seems to have had
his seat in the northern part of the heaven (Mart. Capell. 1. 45)
where Janus was also represented in the templum of Piacenza (_Lex._ s.
v. Janus, p. 28). But this must remain a doubtful point, even though
Lydus (4. 2) tells us that Varro said that the god παρὰ θούσκοις
οὐρανὸν λέγεσθαι.
Footnote 1261:
Nissen, _Templum_, p. 228.
Footnote 1262:
Macrob. 1. 9. 16.
Footnote 1263:
p. 93 foll.; Caes. _B. G._ 6. 18.
Footnote 1264:
M. Mowat thought that this was Janus naturalized in Gaul; but with
Prof. Rhys (p. 81 note) I cannot but think this unlikely.
Footnote 1265:
See _Corpus Poeticum Boreale_, ii. 465.
Footnote 1266:
Roscher, in _Lex._ 18; Rhys, 1. c. 88.
Footnote 1267:
Roscher, _Lex._ 17; Jordan, _Topogr._ 1. 2. 351.
Footnote 1268:
Cic. _De Nat. Deorum_, 2. 27. 67 ‘Transitiones perviae iani, foresque
in liminibus profanarum aedium ianuae nominantur.’ Cp. Macrob. 1. 9.
7.
Footnote 1269:
On the whole question see Jordan, _Topogr_. 1. 2. 215 foll. Ovid
(_Fasti_, 1.257) asks the god ‘Cum tot sint iani, cur stas sacratus in
uno?‘
Footnote 1270:
From Falerii came another janus, with a four-headed simulacrum, which
was set up in the Forum transitorium (Macr. 1. 9. 13; Jordan, _Top_.
1. 2. 348).
Footnote 1271:
Preller made an attempt, which Roscher approves, to identify Portunus
with Janus, Portunus being, according to Varro, ‘Deus portuum
portarumque praeses’ (Interpr. Veron. _Aen._ v. 241). But see on Aug.
17.
Footnote 1272:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account