The first point to notice is that these rites were applicable only to
_involuntary_ acts of commission or omission—an offence against the gods
(nefas) if wittingly committed, was inexpiable. In this case the
offender was _impius_, i. e. had wilfully failed in his duty; and him no
rites could absolve[1334]. But by ordinary offences against the gods we
are not to understand _sin_, in the Christian sense of the word; they
were rather mistakes in ritual, or involuntary omissions—in fact any
real or supposed or possible errors in any of a man’s relations to the
_numina_ around him. He might always be putting himself in the wrong in
regard to these relations, and he must as sedulously endeavour to right
himself. In the life of the ‘privatus’ these trespasses in sacred law
would chiefly be in matters of marriages and funerals and the regular
sacrifices of the household; in the life of the magistrate they would be
mistakes or omissions in his duties on behalf of the State[1335].
Whether in private or public life, they must be duly expiated. It is
needless to point out how powerful a factor this belief must have been
in the growth of a conscience and of the sense of duty; or how stringent
a ‘religio’ was that which, assuming that a man could hardly commit an
offence except unwittingly, made the possible exceptional case fatal to
his position as a member of a community which depended for its wholesome
existence on the good will of the gods.
Remembering that among the divine beings to whom it was most essential
for each family to fulfil its duties, were the _di manes_, or dead
ancestors and members of the family, we see at once that February with
its Parentalia was an important month in the matter of expiatory rites.
Ovid, though suggesting a fancy derivation for the name of the month,
expresses this idea clearly enough:
Aut quia _placatis_ sunt tempora pura sepulcris
Tum cum ferales praeteriere dies[1336].
But the other etymology given by the poet is, as we have seen, the right
one, and may bring us to another class of _piacula_, of which we find an
example this month in the Lupercalia.
Mensis ab his dictus, secta quia pelle Luperci
Omne solum lustrant, idque piamen habent[1337].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account