Schwegler, i. 354 foll.: the general result is given in _Lex._ s. v. Evander, vol. 1. 1395. Evander himself = Faunus. It is possible that there may be some basis of truth in the Arcadian legend: we await further archaeological inquiry. Footnote 1401: See on Dec. 5; and _Lex._ s. v. Faunus, p. 1458. Footnote 1402: Serv. _Aen._ 2. 351. The whole passage is very interesting. See on Dec. 21; and Bouché-Leclercq, _Pontifes_, 28 and 49. Footnote 1403: _Fasti_, 2. 282; Marq. 443. Footnote 1404: Plut. _Q. R._ 111; Gell. 10. 15; Arnob. 7. 21. Footnote 1405: _Rom._ 21: quoted above, p. 311. Val. Max. l. c. seems also to imply it: ‘Facto sacrificio caesisque capris, epularum hilaritate ac vino largiore provecti, divisa pastorali turba, cincti pellibus immolatarum hostiarum, iocantes obvios petiverunt.’ Footnote 1406: Even this point is not quite certain; but see Hartung, _Rel. der Römer_, ii. 178, and Mannhardt, 78. Footnote 1407: Ox, sheep and pig were the usual victims; the dog was only offered to Robigus (see on April 25), to the Lares Praestites and to Mana Geneta; the goat only to Bacchus and Aesculapius, foreign deities (Marq. 172). The goat-skin of Juno Sospita is certainly Greek: _Lex._ s. v. Iuno, 595. The goat was a special Hebrew _piaculum_ (Robertson Smith, 448; cf. 453). Footnote 1408: Robertson Smith, 379. Footnote 1409: Ib. 381. Footnote 1410: _Rom._ 21 οἱ μὲν ᾐμαγμένῃ μαχαίρᾳ τοῦ μετώπου θιγγάνουσιν, ἕτεροι δ’ ἀπομάττουσιν εὐθὺς ἔριον βεβρεγμένον γάλακτι προσφέροντες. Γελᾶν δὲ δεῖ τὰ μειρόκια μετὰ τὴν ἀπόμαξιν. Footnote 1411: So Schwegler. l. c. and reff. in Marq. 443 notes 11-13. Dion. Hal. (1. 32) compared the human sacrifice in the cult of Zeus Lycaeus in Arcadia. See Farnell, _Cults_, i. 40 foll. Footnote 1412: We ought to have the whole _history_ of the Lupercalia if we are to explain it rightly; it is impossible to guess through what stages and changes it may have passed. Footnote 1413: 4. 478 (quoted in a valuable section (23) of Hermann’s _Gottesdienstliche Alterthümer der Griechen_). Footnote 1414: For examples of this idea see under Feb. 24 (Regifugium); Robertson Smith, 286; Mannhardt, _Myth. Forsch._ 58 foll. Footnote 1415: It may indeed be misrepresented by Plutarch (who is the only writer who mentions it), and may have been originally an ἀλολυγή. For the confusion of mournful and joyful cries at a sacrifice see Robertson Smith, 411. Footnote 1416: Robertson Smith notes (p. 396) that young men, or rather lads, occur as sacrificers in Exodus xxiv. 5. Footnote 1417: p. 91 foll. Footnote 1418: