The definition given by Porphyrio is ‘Umbras vagantes hominum ante diem
mortuorum atque ideo metuendas[414].’ Nonius has the following: ‘Lemures
larvae nocturnae et terrificationes imaginum et bestiarum[415].’ From
these passages it would seem that _lemures_ and _larvae_ mean much the
same thing; on the other hand Appuleius[416] implies that _lemures_ is a
general word for spirits after they have left the body, while those that
haunt houses are especially called _larvae_. But on a question of this
kind, the philosophical and uncritical Appuleius is not to be weighed as
an authority against either Nonius or Porphyrio, who may quite possibly
be here representing the learning of the Augustan age; and a perusal of
the whole of his passage will show that he is simply trying to classify
ghosts by the light of his own imagination. Judging from the hints of
the two other scholars, we may perhaps conclude that _lemures_ and
_larvae_ are to be distinguished as hostile ghosts from _manes_, the
good people (as the word is generally explained), i. e. those duly
buried in the city of the dead, and whom their living descendants have
no need to fear so long as they pay them their due rites at the proper
seasons as members of the family. And this conclusion is confirmed by
the curious etymology of Ovid[417], reproduced by Porphyrio, deriving
Lemuria from Remus. whose violent death was supposed to have been
expiated by the institution of the festival. The difficulty is to see
why, if the _lemures_ were unburied, evil, or hostile spirits, a special
festival of three days should have been necessary to appease or quiet
them; and I can only account for this by supposing that such spirits
were especially numerous in an age of uncivilized life and constant war
and violence, and that they formed a large part of the whole world of
evil demons whose expulsion was periodically demanded. It may have been
the case that at this particular time in May, when the days were
_nefasti_ and marriages were ill-omened, these spirits became
particularly restless and needed to be laid.
Such an explanation as this of the Lemuria is on the whole preferable to
that which would regard it as the original Roman festival of _all_ the
dead; for there is now abundant evidence that even in the earliest ages
of Italian life the practice of orderly burial in necropoleis was
universal[418], and this is a practice that seems inconsistent with a
general belief in the dead as hostile and haunting spirits.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account