But, given the details of the rite, and the popular belief about the old
men as victims, what explanation can we hope to arrive at? We may freely
admit that no satisfactory etymology of the word _Argei_ is forthcoming;
but this is perhaps, in a negative sense, an advantage to our
inquiry[436]. The Romans derived it from the Greek Ἀργεῖοι; and to this
etymology Mommsen is now disposed to return. The writer of the article
‘Argei’ in the _Mythological Lexicon_ derived it from _varka-s_ =
‘wolf’; others have believed it to come from a root _arg_ = ‘white’ or
‘shining,’ and though the termination _eus_ is hardly a Latin one, it
may be that this is the true basis of the word[437].
Instead of prejudging the case by fanciful etymologies, or by attempting
to decide the question whether the Romans ever practised the rites of
human sacrifice, we will take the leading features of the ceremony, and
see in what direction they may on the whole direct us. That done, it may
be possible to sum up the debate, though a final and decisive verdict is
not to be expected.
The features which demand attention are (1) the processional character
of the rites; (2) the presence of the Pontifices and the Vestals; (3)
the mourning of the Flaminica Dialis; (4) the rush-puppets and their
immersion in the Tiber.
1. We can hardly doubt that there was a procession to the _pons
sublicius_, though the fact is not expressly stated. We are tempted to
believe that it visited each _sacellum_, and there found, or possibly
made, the puppet (_simulacrum_), which thus represented the district of
which the _sacellum_ was the sacred centre; and that it then proceeded,
bearing the puppets, probably by the Forum and Vicus Tuscus to the
bridge[438]. Now if this feature can help us at all—if we accept the
connexion of the March and May ceremonies and their processional
character—it must point in the direction of the purification of land or
city, on the analogy of other Italian ceremonies of the same kind. At
the end of this month took place the Ambarvalia, when the priests went
round the land with prayer and sacrifice to ensure the good growth of
the crops; and we have a remarkable instance of the same kind of
practice in the celebrated inscription of Iguvium. Not only each city,
but each _pagus_, and even each farmer, duly purified his land in some
such way, cleansing it from the powers of evil and sterility, while at
the same time the boundaries were renewed in the memories of all
concerned. Bearing this in mind, and also the season of the year, we may
fairly guess that the Argean processions had some relation to
agriculture, and to the welfare of the precarious stock of wealth of an
agricultural community.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account