The Roman hat mystery : $b A problem in deductionQueen, Ellery
General
The Roman hat mystery : $b A problem in deduction
Queen, Ellery
Detective and mystery stories; Fathers and sons -- Fiction; Novelists -- Fiction; Police -- New York (State) -- New York -- Fiction
“Don’t be funny, now, you rascal,” growled Queen. “Here’s what I
make of it. All in all, we are dealing with eight seats—one in which
Field sat, for which we have the stub found on Field’s person; one in
which the murderer sat, for which we have the stub found by Flint;
and finally the six empty seats for which tickets were bought, as
established by the box-office report, and for which stubs were not
found, torn or whole, anywhere in the theatre or box-office. First of
all, it is barely possible that all of those six whole tickets were in
the theatre Monday night, and went out of the theatre on somebody’s
person. Remember, the search of individuals was necessarily not so
exhaustive as to include an examination for small things like tickets.
This, however, is highly improbable. The best explanation is that
either Field or his murderer bought all eight tickets at one time,
intending to use two and reserving the other six to insure absolute
privacy during the short time that the business was to be transacted.
In this case, the most sensible thing to have done was to destroy the
tickets as soon as they were bought; which was probably done by either
Field or the murderer, according to who made the arrangements. We must,
therefore, forget those six tickets—they’re gone and we’ll never get
our hands on them.
“To proceed,” continued the Inspector. “We know that Field and his
victim entered the theatre separately. This may positively be deduced
from the fact that when I put the two stubs back to front, the torn
edges did not match. When two people enter together, the tickets are
presented together and are invariably torn together. Now—this does
not say that they did not come in at practically the same time,
because for purposes of safety they may have come in one after the
other, as if they did not know each other. However, Madge O’Connell
claims no one sat in LL30 during Act I, and the orangeade-boy, Jess
Lynch, testified that ten minutes after Act II had started, there was
still no one in LL30. This means that the murderer either had not yet
entered the theatre, _or_ he had come in before but was sitting in some
other part of the orchestra, having a ticket necessarily for another
seat.”
Ellery shook his head. “I realize that as well as you, son,” said the
old man testily. “I’m just following the thought through. I was going
to say that it doesn’t seem likely the murderer had come into the
theatre at the regular time. It’s probable that he entered at least ten
minutes after the second act started.”
“I can give you a proof of that,” said Ellery lazily.
The Inspector took a pinch of snuff. “I know—those cabalistic figures
on the program. How did they read?
930
815
50,000
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account