The Roman hat mystery : $b A problem in deductionQueen, Ellery
General
The Roman hat mystery : $b A problem in deduction
Queen, Ellery
Detective and mystery stories; Fathers and sons -- Fiction; Novelists -- Fiction; Police -- New York (State) -- New York -- Fiction
The Inspector essayed a feeble smile. “Just—a—little tired, son, I
guess,” he grunted. “I just heard from our housebreaker....”
“And—?”
“He found absolutely nothing.”
Ellery gripped his father’s arm and led him to the chair by the bed.
The old man slumped into it, his eyes ineffably weary. “Ellery, old
son,” he said, “the last shred of evidence is gone. It’s maddening! Not
a morsel of physical, tangible evidence that would convict the murderer
in court. What have we? A series of perfectly sound deductions—and
that’s all. A good lawyer would make Swiss cheese out of our case....
Well! The last word hasn’t been spoken yet,” he added with a sudden
grimness as he rose from the chair. He pounded Ellery’s broad back in
returning vigor.
“Get to bed, son,” he said. “You’ve got to get up early to-morrow
morning. I’m going to sit up and think.”
INTERLUDE
IN WHICH THE READER’S ATTENTION IS RESPECTFULLY REQUESTED
The current vogue in detective literature is all for the practice of
placing the reader in the position of chief sleuth. I have prevailed
upon Mr. Ellery Queen to permit at this point in The Roman Hat Mystery
the interpolation of a challenge to the reader.... “Who killed Monte
Field?” “How was the murder accomplished?” ... Mr. Queen agrees with
me that the alert student of mystery tales, now being in possession of
all the pertinent facts, should at this stage of the story have reached
definite conclusions on the questions propounded. The solution—or
enough of it to point unerringly to the guilty character—may be reached
by a series of logical deductions and psychological observations....
In closing my last personal appearance in the tale let me admonish the
reader with a variation of the phrase _Caveat Emptor_: “Let the reader
beware!”
J. J. McC.
PART FOUR
_“The perfect criminal is a superman. He must be meticulous in his
technique: unseen, unseeable, a Lone Wolf. He must have neither friends
nor dependents. He must be careful to a fault, quick, of brain, hand
and foot.... But these are nothing. There have been such men.... On
the other hand, he must be a favored child of Fate—for circumstances
over which he cannot have the remotest control must never contrive his
downfall. This, I think, is more difficult to achieve.... But the last
is most difficult of all. He must never repeat his crime, his weapon
or his motive! ... In all my twoscore years as an official of the
American police I have not once encountered the perfect criminal nor
investigated the perfect crime.”_
—_From_ American Crime and Methods of Detection,
_By_ Richard Queen.
CHAPTER XIX
IN WHICH INSPECTOR QUEEN CONDUCTS MORE LEGAL CONVERSATIONS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account