The Roman hat mystery : $b A problem in deductionQueen, Ellery
General
The Roman hat mystery : $b A problem in deduction
Queen, Ellery
Detective and mystery stories; Fathers and sons -- Fiction; Novelists -- Fiction; Police -- New York (State) -- New York -- Fiction
“Barry isn’t anywhere near a full-blooded negro,” protested the
Inspector. “He has just a drop in his veins—just a drop, but it would
have been more than enough for the Ives-Popes.... To get on. When
the papers had been discovered and read—we knew everything. Who—how—why
the crime was committed. So we took stock of our evidence to bring
about a conviction. You can’t hale a man into court on a murder charge
without evidence.... Well, what do you think we had? Nothing!
“Let me discuss the clues which might have been useful as evidence. The
lady’s purse—that was out. Valueless, as you know.... The source of
the poison—a total failure. Incidentally, Barry did procure it exactly
as Dr. Jones suggested—Jones, the toxicologist. Barry bought ordinary
gasoline and distilled the tetra ethyl lead from it. There was no trace
left.... Another possible clue—Monte Field’s hat. It was gone.... The
extra tickets for the six vacant seats—we had never seen them and there
seemed little chance that we ever would.... The only other material
evidence—the papers—indicated motive but proved nothing. By this
token Morgan might have committed the crime, or any member of Field’s
criminal organization.
“Our only hope for bringing about a conviction depended upon our
scheme to have Barry’s apartment burglarized in the hope that either
the hat, or the tickets, or some other clue like the poison or
the poison-apparatus, would be found. Velie got me a professional
housebreaker and Barry’s apartment was rifled Friday night while he
was acting his rôle in the theatre. Not a trace of any of these clues
came to light. The hat, the tickets, the poison—everything had been
destroyed. Obviously, Barry would have done that; we could only make
sure.
“In desperation, I called a meeting of a number of the Monday night
audience, hoping that I would find someone who remembered seeing Barry
that night. Sometimes, you know, people recall events later which
they forgot completely in the excitement of a previous quizzing. But
this too, as it happened, was a failure. The only thing of value
that turned up was the orangeade boy’s testimony about seeing Field
pick up an evening bag in the alley. This got us nowhere as far as
Barry was concerned, however. And remember that when we questioned the
cast Thursday night we got no direct evidence from them.
“So there we were with a beautifully hypothetical statement of facts
for a jury, but not a shred of genuine evidence. The case we had to
present would have offered no difficulties to a shrewd defending
attorney. It was all circumstantial evidence, based chiefly on
reasoning. You know as well as I do what a chance such a case would
have in court.... Then my troubles really began, for Ellery had to
leave town.
“I racked my brains—the few I have.” Queen scowled at his empty
coffee-cup. “Things looked black enough. How could I convict a man
without evidence? It was maddening. And then Ellery did me the final
service of wiring me a suggestion.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account