The Roman Poets of the Republic, 3rd editionSellar, W. Y. (William Young)
History
The Roman Poets of the Republic, 3rd edition
Sellar, W. Y. (William Young)
Latin poetry -- History and criticism
Mira sunt
Ni illic homost aut dormitator aut sector zonarius.
Loca contemplat, circumspectat sese, atque aedis noscitat[91].
He tells an imaginary story or adventure, such as that which Chrysalus
invents of the pursuit of his vessel by a piratical craft--
Ubi portu eximus, homines remigio sequi,
Neque aves neque venti citius, etc.[92],
or the account which Curculio gives of his encounter with the
soldier[93], tersely, rapidly, and vividly, as if he were recalling
some scene within his own recent experience. He imitates the style
of tragedy--as in the imaginary speech of the Ghost in the
Mostellaria--in such a manner as to show that he might have rivalled
Ennius in the art of tragic rhythm and expression, if his genius had
allowed him to pass beyond the province which was peculiarly his
own. His plays abound in pithy sayings which have anticipated popular
proverbs, or the happy hits of popular poets in modern times, such
as the 'nudo detrahere vestimenta,' in the Asinaria, and the
'virtute formae id evenit te ut deceat quidquid habeas[94],' in the
Mostellaria. He writes letters with the forms of courtesy, and with
the ease and simplicity characteristic of the best epistles of a later
age. His resources of language are never wanting for any call which he
may make upon them. In a few descriptive passages he shows a command
of the language of forcible poetic imagination. But he does not often
betray a sense of beauty in action, character, or Nature: and thus
if his style altogether wants the peculiar charm of the later Latin
poets, and the tenderness and urbanity of Terence, the explanation of
this defect is perhaps to be sought rather in the limited play which
he allowed to his finer sensibilities, than in any inability to avail
himself of the full capabilities of his native language.
Whether the deficiency in the sense of beauty should deny to him the
name of a great poet, is to be answered only when agreement has been
attained as to the definition of a poet. He was certainly a true and
prodigally creative genius. He is also thoroughly representative of
his race--not of the gravity and dignity superinduced on the natural
Italian temperament by the strict discipline of Roman life, and by
the sense of superiority which arises among the governing men of an
imperial state--but of the strong and healthy vitality which enabled
the Italian to play his part in history, and of the quick observation
and ready resource, the lively emotional and social temperament, the
keen enjoyment of life, which are the accompaniment of that original
endowment.
[Footnote 1: Prologue to Casina, 18, 19.]
[Footnote 2: Prologue to Amphitryo, 52.]
[Footnote 3: Licinius and Atilius are placed before Terence in
the Canon of Volcatius Sedigitus.]
[Footnote 4: E.g. Pseudolus, 1081:--
'Nugas theatri: verba quae in comoediis
Solent lenoni dici, quae pueri sciunt.'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account