Rome -- History -- Republic, 265-30 B.C. -- Fiction
"I indeed think, with those who have preceded me, that every torture is
too small for their atrocity and crime. But it is human nature’s trick to
remember always that which occurs the last in order. Forgetful of the
criminal’s guilt, the world dwells ever on the horror of his punishment,
if it lean never so little to the side of severity. Well sure am I, that
the speech of Decius Silanus, a brave and energetic man, was dictated by
his love for the republic—that in a cause so weighty he is moved neither
by favor nor resentment. Yet his vote to my eyes appears, I say not cruel
—for what could be cruel, inflicted on such men?—but foreign to the sense
of our institutions. Now it is clear, Silanus, that either fear of future
peril, or indignation at past wrong, impelled you to vote for an
unprecedented penalty! Of fear it is needless to speak farther; when
through the active energy of that most eminent man, our consul, such
forces are assembled under arms! concerning the punishment of these men we
must speak, however, as the circumstances of the case require. We must
admit that in agony and wo death is no penalty, but rather the repose from
sorrow. Death alone is the refuge from every mortal suffering—in death
alone there is no place for joy or grief. But if this be not so,
wherefore, in the name of the Gods! have ye not added also to your
sentence, that they be scourged before their execution? Is it, that the
Porcian law forbids? That cannot be—since other laws as strenuously
prohibit the infliction of capital punishment on condemned citizens,
enjoining that they be suffered to go into exile. Is it, then, that to be
scourged is more severe and cruel than to be slain? Not so—for what can be
too severe or too cruel for men convicted of such crime. If on the other
hand it be less severe, how is it fitting to obey that law in the lesser,
which you set at naught in the greater article? But, you will ask me
perchance, who will find fault with any punishment inflicted upon the
parricides of the republic? Time—future days—fortune, whose caprice
governs nations! True, these men merit all that can befall them; but do
ye, Conscript Fathers, pause on the precedent which you establish against
others? Never did bad example arise but from a good precedent—only when
the reins of empire have fallen from wise hands into ignorant or wicked
guidance, that good example is perverted from grand and worthy to base and
unworthy ends. The men of Lacedemon, when they had conquered Athens, set
thirty tyrants at the helm who should control the commonwealth. They at
the first began to take off the guiltiest individuals, wretches hated by
all, without form of trial. Thereat the people were rejoiced, and cried
out that their deaths were just and merited. Ere long, when license had
gained ground, they slew alike the virtuous and the guilty, and governed
all by terror. Thus did that state, oppressed by slavery, rue bitterly its
insane mirth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account