The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveysBruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
History
The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveys
Bruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
Great Britain -- Antiquities, Roman; Walls, Roman -- Great Britain
JOHN HORSLEY was the first and mightiest of the three—is it too much
to say that he was the father of the science of Archæology? Born in an
unknown locality of this county, receiving his elementary education at
Newcastle, his academical at Edinburgh, he spent the greater portion
of his life as the pastor of a Presbyterian congregation in Morpeth.
His tastes, and great familiarity with the classics, induced him to
devote his leisure hours to the study of the antiquities of
Northumberland. Had he conceived that the Britannia Romana would have
cost him one-third of the time which its execution required, the world
would never have seen it. Having embarked in the undertaking, he felt
it his duty to make it as good as he could. How severe his toils, how
great his pecuniary sacrifices, how ardent his aspirations after
emancipation from his self-imposed task, in order that he might
entirely devote himself to his sacred calling, who shall tell? The
thought that his flock might eventually be no losers, that his family
and his own fair fame might gain by the enterprise, buoyed him up in
his course. On 2 Jan. 1731-2, he put the finishing stroke to his
labours, the dedication of his work bearing that date. Now he might
hope to reap the fruits of his toils—the enjoyment of rest, such as
the wearied only know, the congratulations of friends, the approbation
of the learned, the replenishment of his exhausted means. None of
these fruits he enjoyed. He can scarcely have had the satisfaction of
casting his eyes upon a completed copy of his work. The ink of his
dedication was hardly dry when he was summoned to the unseen world.
Respecting him who recorded the mighty doings of the Romans in
Britain, the parish clerk of Morpeth made the following entry in the
church-yard calendar:—Buried,
‘_1731-2, Jan. 15_, Mr. John Horsley.’
‘Vanity of vanities, all is vanity.’ As regards the honours or
enjoyments of this world, he died an utterly unrequited man. Even of
that bubble, posthumous fame, an attempt was made to rob him.
Warburton, in his Vallum Romanum, transfers Horsley ‘in bulk’ to his
pages—he even copies, without alteration, the opinions which Horsley
expresses in the first person. The honest Hutton often quotes the
‘judicious Warburton,’ little knowing whose the feathers are which he
so justly admires. The precise spot where his remains rest is unknown.
He whose lot it was to interpret, after the lapse of many centuries,
the throbbings of natural affection over departed relatives in the
heathen breast, had no one to erect over him, though a Christian
minister, a memorial that should outlive a single century. Even the
parish clerk, in his attachment to the altar and the throne, denies
him, in the sepulchral register, the title which courtesy, at least,
would have accorded him. _Requiescat in pace!_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account