The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveysBruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
History
The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveys
Bruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
Great Britain -- Antiquities, Roman; Walls, Roman -- Great Britain
If the parallelism of the lines of the Vallum be fatal to the theory,
that one of the mounds is the work of Agricola, and the others the work
of Hadrian, a similar mode of reasoning leads to the conclusion, that
the Vallum and the Wall cannot be independent structures. If Severus,
finding that the earth-works of Hadrian had fallen into decay, or were
no longer sufficient to wall out the Caledonians, had determined to
erect a more formidable Barrier, would he not have mapped out its track
without any reference to the former ruinous and inefficient erection?
Had he done so, we should find the lines taking independent
courses—sometimes contiguous, occasionally crossing each other;
sometimes widely separated, seldom pursuing for any distance a parallel
course, but the Wall, as the latest built, uniformly seizing the
strongest points, whether previously occupied by the Vallum or not.
This, however, is not the case; the Wall and Vallum, in crossing the
island, pursue precisely the same track from sea to sea; for the most
part they are in close companionship, and in no instance does the Wall
cut in upon the trenches of the Vallum. At the first view of the
subject, therefore, we should be disposed to question the accuracy of
the opinion which gives to these works distinct dates, and ascribes the
Vallum to Hadrian, and the stone Wall to Severus. Before further
prosecuting this inquiry, it will be well to lay before the reader all
the statements of the ancient historians upon the matter in question; he
will by this means see the necessity of appealing to the structures
themselves for a satisfactory decision of the question.
[Sidenote: TESTIMONY OF HISTORIANS.]
Herodian was contemporary with Severus, and professes to have been an
eye-witness of all that he relates. He gives a detailed account of the
emperor’s proceedings in Britain, but does not once mention the Wall.
Dion Cassius was also contemporary with Severus. As before observed,
that part of the original work which treats of Britain is lost; we have,
however, Xiphiline’s abridgment of it. The only reference which he makes
to the Wall, comports with its existence previous to the arrival of
Severus in Britain, Speaking of that emperor’s expedition against the
Caledonians, he says—
Nor did he ever return from this expedition, but died three years
after he first set out from Rome. He got a prodigious mass of riches
in Britain. The two most considerable bodies of people in that island,
and to which almost all the rest relate, are the Caledonians and the
Meatæ. _The latter dwell near the Barrier Wall_ (οιχουσι δε οἱ μεν
Μαιαται προς αυτῳ τῳ διατειχισματι, ὁ την νῆσον διχῆ τεμνει) _which
divides the island into two parts_.
Spartian, writing about A.D. 280, is the first person who gives us any
direct information about the erection of a Wall; and it is on his
testimony chiefly that the credit of the work has been given to Severus.
Speaking of Hadrian, he says—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account