The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveysBruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
History
The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveys
Bruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
Great Britain -- Antiquities, Roman; Walls, Roman -- Great Britain
The Wall, when it does not fall in with the northern wall of a station,
usually comes up to the northern cheek of its eastern and western
gateways. The Vallum, in like manner, usually approaches close to the
southern wall of the station, or comes up to the defence of the southern
side of the eastern and western portals. Examples of these arrangements
are given in Plate II. At least three of the stations, it must, however,
be observed, are quite detached from both lines of fortification, being
situated to the south of them. They may have been members of Agricola’s
chain of forts.
Probably all the stations have, on their erection, been provided, after
the usual method of Roman castrametation, with four gateways; in several
instances one or more of these portals have been walled up at an early
period, in consequence, probably, of some natural weakness in the
situation.
Narrow streets, intersecting each other at right angles, occupy the
interior of the stations, and abundant ruins, outside the walls,
indicate the fact that extensive suburbs have, in every instance, been
required for the accommodation of the camp-followers.
[Sidenote: THE FERTILITY OF THE STATIONS.]
In selecting a spot for a station, care has been taken that an abundant
supply of water should be at hand. The springs, rivulets, wells, and
aqueducts, whence they procured the needful fluid, are still, in many
places, to be traced; and never did water more limpid, more sparkling,
more invigorating, lave the lips of man, than that which flows from
these sources.
For the most part, the stations—cities which for centuries were the
abodes of busy men, and which resounded with the hum of multitudes, and
the clash of arms,—now present a scene of utter desolation. The wayfarer
may pass through them without knowing it; the streets are levelled, the
temples are overthrown, and the sons and daughters of Italy, Mauritania,
and Spain, whose adopted homes they were, no longer encounter him. The
sheep, depasturing the grass-grown ruins, look listlessly upon the
passer-by, and the curlew, wheeling above his head, screams as at the
presence of an intruder. Whether, or not, sites naturally fertile were
chosen for the stations does not appear; but certain it is, that they
are now for the most part coated with a sward more green and more
luxuriant than that which covers the contiguous grounds. Centuries of
occupation have given them a degree of fertility which, probably, they
will never lose.[25] One can scarcely turn up the soil without meeting,
not only with fragments of Roman pottery and other imperishable
articles, but with the bones of oxen, the tusks of boars, the horns of
deer, and other animal remains. The debris of some of these cities is
considered to be more valuable for farm purposes, than the recent
produce of the fold-yard, and is used as such.
[Sidenote: THE NAMES OF THE STATIONS.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account