The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveysBruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
History
The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveys
Bruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
Great Britain -- Antiquities, Roman; Walls, Roman -- Great Britain
This great military work consisted, in the first place, of an immense
fosse or ditch—averaging about forty feet in width, by some twenty in
depth—which extended over hill and plain, in one unbroken line, from
sea to sea. Behind this ditch, on its southern side, and within a few
feet of its edge, was raised a rampart of intermingled stone and
earth, strengthened by sods of turf, which measured, it is supposed,
about twenty feet in height, and twenty-four in thickness at the base.
This rampart, or _agger_, was surmounted by a parapet, behind which
ran a level platform, for the accommodation of its defenders. To the
southward of the whole was situated the Military Way—a regular
causewayed road, about twenty-feet wide—which kept by the course of
the Wall at irregular distances, approaching, in some instances, to
within a few yards, and in others receding to a considerable extent.
Along the entire line there were established, it is believed, nineteen
principal stations or forts. The mean distance between each may be
stated at rather more than two English miles. Along these intervals
were placed many smaller _castella_, or watch-towers. While the
continuous rampart seems to have been little more than a well-formed
earthen mound, it is probable that many, if not all, of the stations,
were either rivetted with stone or entirely built of that material. In
some places, it would even appear that the Vallum itself had been
raised upon a stone foundation—probably in situations where the ground
was low and marshy, and where it was found necessary to form drains
beneath the works, to prevent the accumulation of water on their
anterior side.
[Sidenote: MUTUAL SUPPORT OF THE BARRIERS.]
The Barrier of the Upper Isthmus never consisted of more than a single
line of fortification. This circumstance may seem to militate against
the view that we have taken of the double line of the Southern Barrier.
If in the one case the conquered tribes to the south were disregarded,
why should they not be so in the other also? We shall not, however,
greatly err if we regard the Antonine Wall as but an advanced work of
Hadrian’s entrenchment. On this view of the matter, the difficulty is at
once removed, for the Lower Barrier would be a sufficient security
against danger in the rear. Certain it is, that the southern line was
not abandoned when the other was constructed. Several altars have been
found on the Lower Barrier inscribed with the name Antoninus Pius.[51] A
slab bearing the names of the consuls Sex. Sulpicius Tertullus, and C.
Tineius Sacerdos, elicits the following remarks from judge Cay[52]:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account